Democracy, environmental commitment and quality

With the rapid industrialization in the developing world, natural environments are worsening and become a hot topic under severe concerns. Regime type has long been debated in explaining environment degradation and response policies across countries. Do democracies always perform better than non-dem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wang, Shuo
Other Authors: Lee Chia-yi
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69831
_version_ 1811695345336320000
author Wang, Shuo
author2 Lee Chia-yi
author_facet Lee Chia-yi
Wang, Shuo
author_sort Wang, Shuo
collection NTU
description With the rapid industrialization in the developing world, natural environments are worsening and become a hot topic under severe concerns. Regime type has long been debated in explaining environment degradation and response policies across countries. Do democracies always perform better than non-democracies on issues of environment? Although previous literatures offer plenty of explanations, few empirical studies could support their theories. To provide quantitative evidence, based on global datasets this paper conducts regression and logistic models to examine democracy's impacts on environmental quality and commitment respectively. The empirical analysis basically supports the view that democracy positively promotes environmental performance. Moreover, although some environmental problems still exist, a case study indicates that democratization indeed makes a significant difference in Brazil, Chile and Mexico.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T07:21:59Z
format Thesis
id ntu-10356/69831
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T07:21:59Z
publishDate 2017
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/698312020-11-01T08:31:30Z Democracy, environmental commitment and quality Wang, Shuo Lee Chia-yi S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science With the rapid industrialization in the developing world, natural environments are worsening and become a hot topic under severe concerns. Regime type has long been debated in explaining environment degradation and response policies across countries. Do democracies always perform better than non-democracies on issues of environment? Although previous literatures offer plenty of explanations, few empirical studies could support their theories. To provide quantitative evidence, based on global datasets this paper conducts regression and logistic models to examine democracy's impacts on environmental quality and commitment respectively. The empirical analysis basically supports the view that democracy positively promotes environmental performance. Moreover, although some environmental problems still exist, a case study indicates that democratization indeed makes a significant difference in Brazil, Chile and Mexico. Master of Science (International Political Economy) 2017-03-29T07:00:04Z 2017-03-29T07:00:04Z 2017 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69831 en 42 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science
Wang, Shuo
Democracy, environmental commitment and quality
title Democracy, environmental commitment and quality
title_full Democracy, environmental commitment and quality
title_fullStr Democracy, environmental commitment and quality
title_full_unstemmed Democracy, environmental commitment and quality
title_short Democracy, environmental commitment and quality
title_sort democracy environmental commitment and quality
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Political science
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/69831
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshuo democracyenvironmentalcommitmentandquality