Numerical modelling of non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller

The performance of a marine propeller is often studied in two conditions – non cavitating and cavitating flow. In the latter case, cavitation affects performance and causes significant damage to marine propellers. By predicting cavitation, propeller design can be evaluated and optimized for better p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Woo, Jason Jia Wen
Other Authors: Chan Weng Kong
Format: Final Year Project (FYP)
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/71982
_version_ 1811679206436765696
author Woo, Jason Jia Wen
author2 Chan Weng Kong
author_facet Chan Weng Kong
Woo, Jason Jia Wen
author_sort Woo, Jason Jia Wen
collection NTU
description The performance of a marine propeller is often studied in two conditions – non cavitating and cavitating flow. In the latter case, cavitation affects performance and causes significant damage to marine propellers. By predicting cavitation, propeller design can be evaluated and optimized for better performance. Although many studies on numerical modelling of propeller flows with and without cavitation have been done to date, some issues such as mesh generation strategies and selection of turbulence model still need to be addressed. This study sought to model non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller using an unstructured mesh and the steady RANS solver available in ANSYS Fluent. With regard to non-cavitating flow, the RANS solver coupled with SST k-ω turbulence model was used. In the case of cavitating flow, the homogenous multi-phase mixture RANS solver coupled with SST k-ω turbulence model and Schnerr-Sauer’s cavitation model was used. The results obtained for the case of non-cavitating flow showed thrust and torque coefficient decreasing with increasing advance coefficient, similar to trends seen in typical open water diagrams. As for the case of cavitating flow, cavitation patterns at two operating conditions, illustrated by iso-surfaces of vapour volume fraction, showed an overprediction of suction side sheet cavitation in comparison with experimental results. In addition, K_Tand K_Q found in cavitating flow were smaller when compared to that in non-cavitating flow. While steady state calculations were carried out in this study to reduce computational effort, future studies employing an unsteady solver can be done to capture any unsteady cavitation and its behaviour over time.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T03:05:28Z
format Final Year Project (FYP)
id ntu-10356/71982
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T03:05:28Z
publishDate 2017
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/719822023-03-04T18:15:33Z Numerical modelling of non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller Woo, Jason Jia Wen Chan Weng Kong School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Aeronautical engineering The performance of a marine propeller is often studied in two conditions – non cavitating and cavitating flow. In the latter case, cavitation affects performance and causes significant damage to marine propellers. By predicting cavitation, propeller design can be evaluated and optimized for better performance. Although many studies on numerical modelling of propeller flows with and without cavitation have been done to date, some issues such as mesh generation strategies and selection of turbulence model still need to be addressed. This study sought to model non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller using an unstructured mesh and the steady RANS solver available in ANSYS Fluent. With regard to non-cavitating flow, the RANS solver coupled with SST k-ω turbulence model was used. In the case of cavitating flow, the homogenous multi-phase mixture RANS solver coupled with SST k-ω turbulence model and Schnerr-Sauer’s cavitation model was used. The results obtained for the case of non-cavitating flow showed thrust and torque coefficient decreasing with increasing advance coefficient, similar to trends seen in typical open water diagrams. As for the case of cavitating flow, cavitation patterns at two operating conditions, illustrated by iso-surfaces of vapour volume fraction, showed an overprediction of suction side sheet cavitation in comparison with experimental results. In addition, K_Tand K_Q found in cavitating flow were smaller when compared to that in non-cavitating flow. While steady state calculations were carried out in this study to reduce computational effort, future studies employing an unsteady solver can be done to capture any unsteady cavitation and its behaviour over time. Bachelor of Engineering (Aerospace Engineering) 2017-05-23T06:39:56Z 2017-05-23T06:39:56Z 2017 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/71982 en Nanyang Technological University 99 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Aeronautical engineering
Woo, Jason Jia Wen
Numerical modelling of non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller
title Numerical modelling of non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller
title_full Numerical modelling of non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller
title_fullStr Numerical modelling of non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller
title_full_unstemmed Numerical modelling of non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller
title_short Numerical modelling of non-cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller
title_sort numerical modelling of non cavitating and cavitating flow around a marine propeller
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Aeronautical engineering
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/71982
work_keys_str_mv AT woojasonjiawen numericalmodellingofnoncavitatingandcavitatingflowaroundamarinepropeller