The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation

This study examines the reason why ASEAN countries fall short of their AEC commitments. While agreeing with the existing studies that ASEAN economic integration is a function of globalisation and has substantial welfare generating effect, this dissertation argues that this is only part of the story....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sanchita Basu Das
Other Authors: J. Soedradjad Djiwandono
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73366
_version_ 1811693100356075520
author Sanchita Basu Das
author2 J. Soedradjad Djiwandono
author_facet J. Soedradjad Djiwandono
Sanchita Basu Das
author_sort Sanchita Basu Das
collection NTU
description This study examines the reason why ASEAN countries fall short of their AEC commitments. While agreeing with the existing studies that ASEAN economic integration is a function of globalisation and has substantial welfare generating effect, this dissertation argues that this is only part of the story. The globalisation variable is unable to explain why AEC offers flexibilities in its commitments. It is also unable to explain why despite such far-reaching benefits, member countries are not able to align their domestic policies to regional promises. There is indeed a gap in the existing literature on why, despite agreeing to binding commitments, AEC implementation remains incomplete among member countries. The dissertation introduces the domestic variable to explain the disconnect between policy goals and policy implementation. Following International Political Economy (IPE) rather than neoclassical economics, domestic variable, derived from the demand side of trade policy, explains the flexible design of AEC measures. The division over liberal and protectionist preference in national economies and varied domestic interests across members explain the broad principles in AEC policy documents, which makes implementation difficult. The broad measures provide room to implementing agencies to interpret the policy as per their own understanding and convenience, thereby creating a mismatch between policy goals and final outcome. Domestic variables, in terms of organising the national implementation process and supportive interest groups, are also key imperatives for timely implementation. Inefficiency in domestic administrative process and lack of government-private sector engagement are important reasons for ASEAN to fall short of full implementation. Unlike existing studies of AEC, which are mostly based on trade theory models or examine the progress in AEC policy implementation with limited explanation for the gaps, this dissertation considers domestic factors as a crucial analytical variable for success or not of policy implementation. Using documentary research and elite interviews, and guided by theoretical insights, the study concludes that although AEC is a function of both globalisation and domestic interest, it is the latter that plays a crucial role in the state of regional economic integration. It is the domestic variable that influences not only the form of the regional policy but also the national administrative process and attitude of interest group and has implication for policy implementation eventually. The domestic determinant explains why AEC has fallen short of ‘single market and production base’ in practice till now.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T06:46:19Z
format Thesis
id ntu-10356/73366
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T06:46:19Z
publishDate 2018
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/733662020-11-01T08:28:49Z The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation Sanchita Basu Das J. Soedradjad Djiwandono S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic development This study examines the reason why ASEAN countries fall short of their AEC commitments. While agreeing with the existing studies that ASEAN economic integration is a function of globalisation and has substantial welfare generating effect, this dissertation argues that this is only part of the story. The globalisation variable is unable to explain why AEC offers flexibilities in its commitments. It is also unable to explain why despite such far-reaching benefits, member countries are not able to align their domestic policies to regional promises. There is indeed a gap in the existing literature on why, despite agreeing to binding commitments, AEC implementation remains incomplete among member countries. The dissertation introduces the domestic variable to explain the disconnect between policy goals and policy implementation. Following International Political Economy (IPE) rather than neoclassical economics, domestic variable, derived from the demand side of trade policy, explains the flexible design of AEC measures. The division over liberal and protectionist preference in national economies and varied domestic interests across members explain the broad principles in AEC policy documents, which makes implementation difficult. The broad measures provide room to implementing agencies to interpret the policy as per their own understanding and convenience, thereby creating a mismatch between policy goals and final outcome. Domestic variables, in terms of organising the national implementation process and supportive interest groups, are also key imperatives for timely implementation. Inefficiency in domestic administrative process and lack of government-private sector engagement are important reasons for ASEAN to fall short of full implementation. Unlike existing studies of AEC, which are mostly based on trade theory models or examine the progress in AEC policy implementation with limited explanation for the gaps, this dissertation considers domestic factors as a crucial analytical variable for success or not of policy implementation. Using documentary research and elite interviews, and guided by theoretical insights, the study concludes that although AEC is a function of both globalisation and domestic interest, it is the latter that plays a crucial role in the state of regional economic integration. It is the domestic variable that influences not only the form of the regional policy but also the national administrative process and attitude of interest group and has implication for policy implementation eventually. The domestic determinant explains why AEC has fallen short of ‘single market and production base’ in practice till now. Doctor of Philosophy 2018-03-05T07:02:13Z 2018-03-05T07:02:13Z 2018 Thesis Sanchita Basu Das. (2018). The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73366 10.32657/10356/73366 en 351 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic development
Sanchita Basu Das
The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation
title The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation
title_full The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation
title_fullStr The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation
title_full_unstemmed The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation
title_short The devil and the details : ASEAN’s struggle with its economic community and implementation
title_sort devil and the details asean s struggle with its economic community and implementation
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic development
url http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73366
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchitabasudas thedevilandthedetailsaseansstrugglewithitseconomiccommunityandimplementation
AT sanchitabasudas devilandthedetailsaseansstrugglewithitseconomiccommunityandimplementation