Can we take enhancement drugs? It depends
The goal of my paper is show that we should abandon the treatment/enhancement distinction in favour of a particularist approach when evaluating the ethics of non-clinical uses of psychiatric drugs because there is no principled way to draw the distinction between treatment and enhancement. To mee...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project (FYP) |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73596 |
_version_ | 1826110708198146048 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jacelyn Yoke Leng |
author2 | Christopher Louis Suhler |
author_facet | Christopher Louis Suhler Lee, Jacelyn Yoke Leng |
author_sort | Lee, Jacelyn Yoke Leng |
collection | NTU |
description | The goal of my paper is show that we should abandon the treatment/enhancement
distinction in favour of a particularist approach when evaluating the ethics of non-clinical uses
of psychiatric drugs because there is no principled way to draw the distinction between
treatment and enhancement. To meet my paper’s objective: I will first introduce the
significance of the treatment/enhancement distinction in influencing healthcare policies. In
section two, I give reasons for why I think that if there was an objective way to capture the idea
of normal functioning, the statistical approach would be the best candidate. Next, in section
three, I will argue that both Tyrer and Steinberg’s and Boorse’s statistical approaches are
inadequate in giving us a defensible conception of normal functioning. In light of this, I propose
in the fourth and final section, that we should consider the particularist approach over the
generalist approach. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T02:38:36Z |
format | Final Year Project (FYP) |
id | ntu-10356/73596 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T02:38:36Z |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/735962019-12-10T13:52:24Z Can we take enhancement drugs? It depends Lee, Jacelyn Yoke Leng Christopher Louis Suhler School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities The goal of my paper is show that we should abandon the treatment/enhancement distinction in favour of a particularist approach when evaluating the ethics of non-clinical uses of psychiatric drugs because there is no principled way to draw the distinction between treatment and enhancement. To meet my paper’s objective: I will first introduce the significance of the treatment/enhancement distinction in influencing healthcare policies. In section two, I give reasons for why I think that if there was an objective way to capture the idea of normal functioning, the statistical approach would be the best candidate. Next, in section three, I will argue that both Tyrer and Steinberg’s and Boorse’s statistical approaches are inadequate in giving us a defensible conception of normal functioning. In light of this, I propose in the fourth and final section, that we should consider the particularist approach over the generalist approach. Bachelor of Arts 2018-04-01T12:11:31Z 2018-04-01T12:11:31Z 2018 Final Year Project (FYP) http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73596 en 32 p. application/pdf |
spellingShingle | DRNTU::Humanities Lee, Jacelyn Yoke Leng Can we take enhancement drugs? It depends |
title | Can we take enhancement drugs? It depends |
title_full | Can we take enhancement drugs? It depends |
title_fullStr | Can we take enhancement drugs? It depends |
title_full_unstemmed | Can we take enhancement drugs? It depends |
title_short | Can we take enhancement drugs? It depends |
title_sort | can we take enhancement drugs it depends |
topic | DRNTU::Humanities |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/73596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejacelynyokeleng canwetakeenhancementdrugsitdepends |