Does deciding among morally relevant options feel like making a choice? How morality constrains people’s sense of choice.
We demonstrate that a difference exists between objectively having and psychologically perceiving multiple-choice options of a given decision, showing that morality serves as a constraint on people’s perceptions of choice. Across 8 studies (N = 2,217), using both experimental and correlational metho...
Main Authors: | Kouchaki, Maryam, Smith, Isaac H., Savani, Krishna |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Nanyang Business School |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/79856 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/50162 |
Similar Items
-
The cancellation heuristic in intertemporal choice shifts people's time preferences
by: Sengupta, Arjun, et al.
Published: (2022) -
When norms loom larger than the self: Susceptibility of preference–choice consistency to normative influence across cultures
by: Savani, Krishna, et al.
Published: (2017) -
The salience of choice fuels independence : implications for self-perception, cognition, and behavior
by: Nanakdewa, Kevin, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Choosing one at a time? Presenting options simultaneously helps people make more optimal decisions than presenting options sequentially
by: Basu, Shankha, et al.
Published: (2017) -
On child agency and moral responsibility: do children possess sufficient capacities for moral agency?
by: Ting, Jermaine Shi Jie
Published: (2024)