Let's vote to classify authentic and manipulative online reviews : the role of comprehensibility, informativeness and writing style
Scholars increasingly seek to investigate differences between authentic and manipulative online reviews. A common line of research argues that authentic and manipulative reviews are distinguishable based on three textual characteristics, namely, comprehensibility, informativeness and writing style....
Main Authors: | Banerjee, Snehasish, Chua, Alton Y. K., Kim, Jung-Jae |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
Format: | Conference Paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80816 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/38862 |
Similar Items
-
Dissecting genuine and deceptive kudos : the case of online hotel reviews
by: Banerjee, Snehasish, et al.
Published: (2015) -
A study of convolutional neural networks for clinical document classification in systematic reviews: Sysreview at CLEF eHealth 2017
by: Lee, Grace Eunkyung
Published: (2018) -
Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: a conceptual framework
by: Tandoc, Edson C., et al.
Published: (2018) -
A proxy signature-based handover authentication scheme for LTE wireless networks
by: Qiu, Yue, et al.
Published: (2017) -
An Efficient EAP-Based Pre-Authentication for Inter-WRAN Handover in TV White Space
by: Wang, Cong, et al.
Published: (2017)