Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels
International airports are highly secured buildings, because they are attractive targets for individuals or groups seeking to make a statement, be it out of political, religious, or social frustrations. Some security experts have suggested that instituting more checkpoints to scan visitors will incr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Commentary |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81952 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41019 |
| _version_ | 1824453910331392000 |
|---|---|
| author | Tan, Eugene E. Guang |
| author2 | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
| author_facet | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Tan, Eugene E. Guang |
| author_sort | Tan, Eugene E. Guang |
| collection | NTU |
| description | International airports are highly secured buildings, because they are attractive targets for individuals or groups seeking to make a statement, be it out of political, religious, or social frustrations. Some security experts have suggested that instituting more checkpoints to scan visitors will increase security, but some are sceptical. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-19T03:13:55Z |
| format | Commentary |
| id | ntu-10356/81952 |
| institution | Nanyang Technological University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-19T03:13:55Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ntu-10356/819522024-03-08T01:51:27Z Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels Tan, Eugene E. Guang S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies International airports are highly secured buildings, because they are attractive targets for individuals or groups seeking to make a statement, be it out of political, religious, or social frustrations. Some security experts have suggested that instituting more checkpoints to scan visitors will increase security, but some are sceptical. 2016-07-29T05:42:33Z 2019-12-06T14:43:41Z 2016-07-29T05:42:33Z 2019-12-06T14:43:41Z 2016 Commentary Tan, E. E. G. (2016). Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 184). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81952 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41019 en RSIS Commentaries, 184-16 Nanyang Technological University 4 p. application/pdf |
| spellingShingle | Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies Tan, Eugene E. Guang Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels |
| title | Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels |
| title_full | Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels |
| title_fullStr | Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels |
| title_full_unstemmed | Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels |
| title_short | Checkpoint or Chokepoint: Aviation Security Lessons from Istanbul and Brussels |
| title_sort | checkpoint or chokepoint aviation security lessons from istanbul and brussels |
| topic | Conflict and Stability Country and Region Studies |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81952 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41019 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT taneugeneeguang checkpointorchokepointaviationsecuritylessonsfromistanbulandbrussels |