After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries
The 12 July 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in The Hague has specified that there are no islands in the Spratly group capable of generating a full set of maritime zones. This has theoretically helped agreement on maritime boundaries in the South China Sea but many problems still remain.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Commentary |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82129 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41151 |
| _version_ | 1826112424204304384 |
|---|---|
| author | Bateman, Sam |
| author2 | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
| author_facet | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Bateman, Sam |
| author_sort | Bateman, Sam |
| collection | NTU |
| description | The 12 July 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in The Hague has specified that there are no islands in the Spratly group capable of generating a full set of maritime zones. This has theoretically helped agreement on maritime boundaries in the South China Sea but many problems still remain. |
| first_indexed | 2024-10-01T03:06:47Z |
| format | Commentary |
| id | ntu-10356/82129 |
| institution | Nanyang Technological University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-10-01T03:06:47Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ntu-10356/821292020-11-01T06:43:03Z After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries Bateman, Sam S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Conflict and Stability East Asia and Asia Pacific The 12 July 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in The Hague has specified that there are no islands in the Spratly group capable of generating a full set of maritime zones. This has theoretically helped agreement on maritime boundaries in the South China Sea but many problems still remain. 2016-08-17T08:56:11Z 2019-12-06T14:47:15Z 2016-08-17T08:56:11Z 2019-12-06T14:47:15Z 2016 Commentary Bateman, S. (2016). After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 199). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82129 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41151 en RSIS Commentaries, 199-16 Nanyang Technological University 3 p. application/pdf |
| spellingShingle | Conflict and Stability East Asia and Asia Pacific Bateman, Sam After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries |
| title | After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries |
| title_full | After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries |
| title_fullStr | After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries |
| title_full_unstemmed | After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries |
| title_short | After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries |
| title_sort | after south china sea ruling good fences or good neighbours implications for maritime boundaries |
| topic | Conflict and Stability East Asia and Asia Pacific |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82129 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41151 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT batemansam aftersouthchinasearulinggoodfencesorgoodneighboursimplicationsformaritimeboundaries |