Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis
We describe a series of experiments that compared 2D/3D input methods for selection and positioning tasks related to medical image analysis. For our study, we chose a switchable P5 Glove Controller, which can be used to provide both 2DOF and 6DOF input control. Our results suggest that for both task...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84329 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/10166 |
| _version_ | 1824456688767336448 |
|---|---|
| author | de Koning, P. J. H. Suinesiaputra, Avan. van Schooten, B. W. van der Geest, R. J. Reiber, Johan H. C. Sloot, Peter M. A. Zudilova-Seinstra, Elena V. |
| author2 | School of Computer Engineering |
| author_facet | School of Computer Engineering de Koning, P. J. H. Suinesiaputra, Avan. van Schooten, B. W. van der Geest, R. J. Reiber, Johan H. C. Sloot, Peter M. A. Zudilova-Seinstra, Elena V. |
| author_sort | de Koning, P. J. H. |
| collection | NTU |
| description | We describe a series of experiments that compared 2D/3D input methods for selection and positioning tasks related to medical image analysis. For our study, we chose a switchable P5 Glove Controller, which can be used to provide both 2DOF and 6DOF input control. Our results suggest that for both tasks the overall performance and accuracy can be improved when the input device with more degrees of freedom (DOF) is used for manipulation of the visualized medical data. 3D input turned out to be more beneficial for the positioning task than for the selection task. In order to determine a potential source of the difference in the task completion time between 2D and 3D input, we also investigated whether there was a significant difference between 2DOF and 6DOF input methods with regard to the time spent on task-specific basic manipulations. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-19T03:58:05Z |
| format | Journal Article |
| id | ntu-10356/84329 |
| institution | Nanyang Technological University |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-19T03:58:05Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ntu-10356/843292020-05-28T07:17:39Z Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis de Koning, P. J. H. Suinesiaputra, Avan. van Schooten, B. W. van der Geest, R. J. Reiber, Johan H. C. Sloot, Peter M. A. Zudilova-Seinstra, Elena V. School of Computer Engineering We describe a series of experiments that compared 2D/3D input methods for selection and positioning tasks related to medical image analysis. For our study, we chose a switchable P5 Glove Controller, which can be used to provide both 2DOF and 6DOF input control. Our results suggest that for both tasks the overall performance and accuracy can be improved when the input device with more degrees of freedom (DOF) is used for manipulation of the visualized medical data. 3D input turned out to be more beneficial for the positioning task than for the selection task. In order to determine a potential source of the difference in the task completion time between 2D and 3D input, we also investigated whether there was a significant difference between 2DOF and 6DOF input methods with regard to the time spent on task-specific basic manipulations. 2013-06-11T03:29:54Z 2019-12-06T15:42:49Z 2013-06-11T03:29:54Z 2019-12-06T15:42:49Z 2009 2009 Journal Article Zudilova-Seinstra, E. V., de Koning, P. J. H., Suinesiaputra, A., van Schooten, B. W., van der Geest, R. J., Reiber, J. H. C., et al. (2009). Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(6), 355-369. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84329 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/10166 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.001 en International journal of human-computer studies © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. |
| spellingShingle | de Koning, P. J. H. Suinesiaputra, Avan. van Schooten, B. W. van der Geest, R. J. Reiber, Johan H. C. Sloot, Peter M. A. Zudilova-Seinstra, Elena V. Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis |
| title | Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis |
| title_full | Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis |
| title_short | Evaluation of 2D and 3D glove input applied to medical image analysis |
| title_sort | evaluation of 2d and 3d glove input applied to medical image analysis |
| url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84329 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/10166 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dekoningpjh evaluationof2dand3dgloveinputappliedtomedicalimageanalysis AT suinesiaputraavan evaluationof2dand3dgloveinputappliedtomedicalimageanalysis AT vanschootenbw evaluationof2dand3dgloveinputappliedtomedicalimageanalysis AT vandergeestrj evaluationof2dand3dgloveinputappliedtomedicalimageanalysis AT reiberjohanhc evaluationof2dand3dgloveinputappliedtomedicalimageanalysis AT slootpeterma evaluationof2dand3dgloveinputappliedtomedicalimageanalysis AT zudilovaseinstraelenav evaluationof2dand3dgloveinputappliedtomedicalimageanalysis |