Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake

The deformation of mantle and crustal rocks in response to stress plays a crucial role in the distribution of seismic and volcanic hazards, controlling tectonic processes ranging from continental drift to earthquake triggering. However, the spatial variation of these dynamic properties is poorly und...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moore, James Daniel Paul, Yu, Hang, Tang, Chi-Hsien, Wang, Teng, Barbot, Sylvain, Peng, Dongju, Masuti, Sagar, Dauwels, Justin, Hsu, Ya-Ju, Lambert, Valère, Nanjundiah, Priyamvada, Wei, Shengji, Lindsey, Eric, Feng, Lujia, Shibazaki, Bunichiro
Other Authors: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85104
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43617
_version_ 1826116159251939328
author Moore, James Daniel Paul
Yu, Hang
Tang, Chi-Hsien
Wang, Teng
Barbot, Sylvain
Peng, Dongju
Masuti, Sagar
Dauwels, Justin
Hsu, Ya-Ju
Lambert, Valère
Nanjundiah, Priyamvada
Wei, Shengji
Lindsey, Eric
Feng, Lujia
Shibazaki, Bunichiro
author2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
author_facet School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Moore, James Daniel Paul
Yu, Hang
Tang, Chi-Hsien
Wang, Teng
Barbot, Sylvain
Peng, Dongju
Masuti, Sagar
Dauwels, Justin
Hsu, Ya-Ju
Lambert, Valère
Nanjundiah, Priyamvada
Wei, Shengji
Lindsey, Eric
Feng, Lujia
Shibazaki, Bunichiro
author_sort Moore, James Daniel Paul
collection NTU
description The deformation of mantle and crustal rocks in response to stress plays a crucial role in the distribution of seismic and volcanic hazards, controlling tectonic processes ranging from continental drift to earthquake triggering. However, the spatial variation of these dynamic properties is poorly understood as they are difficult to measure. We exploited the large stress perturbation incurred by the 2016 earthquake sequence in Kumamoto, Japan, to directly image localized and distributed deformation. The earthquakes illuminated distinct regions of low effective viscosity in the lower crust, notably beneath the Mount Aso and Mount Kuju volcanoes, surrounded by larger-scale variations of viscosity across the back-arc. This study demonstrates a new potential for geodesy to directly probe rock rheology in situ across many spatial and temporal scales.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T04:06:47Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/85104
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T04:06:47Z
publishDate 2017
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/851042020-09-26T21:28:08Z Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake Moore, James Daniel Paul Yu, Hang Tang, Chi-Hsien Wang, Teng Barbot, Sylvain Peng, Dongju Masuti, Sagar Dauwels, Justin Hsu, Ya-Ju Lambert, Valère Nanjundiah, Priyamvada Wei, Shengji Lindsey, Eric Feng, Lujia Shibazaki, Bunichiro School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Earth Observatory of Singapore Viscoelasticity Geodesy The deformation of mantle and crustal rocks in response to stress plays a crucial role in the distribution of seismic and volcanic hazards, controlling tectonic processes ranging from continental drift to earthquake triggering. However, the spatial variation of these dynamic properties is poorly understood as they are difficult to measure. We exploited the large stress perturbation incurred by the 2016 earthquake sequence in Kumamoto, Japan, to directly image localized and distributed deformation. The earthquakes illuminated distinct regions of low effective viscosity in the lower crust, notably beneath the Mount Aso and Mount Kuju volcanoes, surrounded by larger-scale variations of viscosity across the back-arc. This study demonstrates a new potential for geodesy to directly probe rock rheology in situ across many spatial and temporal scales. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Accepted version 2017-08-22T01:36:59Z 2019-12-06T15:57:09Z 2017-08-22T01:36:59Z 2019-12-06T15:57:09Z 2017 Journal Article Moore, J. D. P., Yu, H., Tang, C.-H., Wang, T., Barbot, S., Peng, D., et al. (2017). Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake. Science, 356(6334), 163-167. 0036-8075 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85104 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43617 10.1126/science.aal3422 en Science © 2017 The Authors (published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)). This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in Science, published by American Association for the Advancement of Science on behalf of the authors. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document.  The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3422]. 34 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle Viscoelasticity
Geodesy
Moore, James Daniel Paul
Yu, Hang
Tang, Chi-Hsien
Wang, Teng
Barbot, Sylvain
Peng, Dongju
Masuti, Sagar
Dauwels, Justin
Hsu, Ya-Ju
Lambert, Valère
Nanjundiah, Priyamvada
Wei, Shengji
Lindsey, Eric
Feng, Lujia
Shibazaki, Bunichiro
Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake
title Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake
title_full Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake
title_fullStr Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake
title_full_unstemmed Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake
title_short Imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 Mw 7.1 Kumamoto earthquake
title_sort imaging the distribution of transient viscosity after the 2016 mw 7 1 kumamoto earthquake
topic Viscoelasticity
Geodesy
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85104
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/43617
work_keys_str_mv AT moorejamesdanielpaul imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT yuhang imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT tangchihsien imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT wangteng imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT barbotsylvain imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT pengdongju imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT masutisagar imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT dauwelsjustin imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT hsuyaju imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT lambertvalere imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT nanjundiahpriyamvada imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT weishengji imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT lindseyeric imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT fenglujia imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake
AT shibazakibunichiro imagingthedistributionoftransientviscosityafterthe2016mw71kumamotoearthquake