A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits

This paper describes the step-by-step process of characterizing tephra-fall deposits based on isopach, isomass and isopleth maps as well as thickness transects at different distances from their source. It covers the most frequently used empirical methods of integration (i.e., exponential, power–law...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Biass, Sébastien, Bonadonna, Costanza, Houghton, Bruce F.
Other Authors: Asian School of the Environment
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89204
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49316
_version_ 1811676847784591360
author Biass, Sébastien
Bonadonna, Costanza
Houghton, Bruce F.
author2 Asian School of the Environment
author_facet Asian School of the Environment
Biass, Sébastien
Bonadonna, Costanza
Houghton, Bruce F.
author_sort Biass, Sébastien
collection NTU
description This paper describes the step-by-step process of characterizing tephra-fall deposits based on isopach, isomass and isopleth maps as well as thickness transects at different distances from their source. It covers the most frequently used empirical methods of integration (i.e., exponential, power–law and Weibull) and provides a description of the key physical parameters that can be retrieved from tephra-fall deposits. To streamline this process, a Matlab function called TephraFits is proposed, which is highly customizable and also guides the interpretation of the results. The function calculates parameters such as the deposit volume/mass, the VEI/magnitude, and the rates of thickness–decay away from the source and assists in eruption classification using deposit–based schemes. The function also contains a stochastic mode that can be used to propagate the uncertainty from field data to the quantification of eruption source parameters. The use of this function is demonstrated using the the 1180 ±80 years B.P. andesitic subplinian/Plinian tephra deposit Layer 5 of Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador. In addition, we constrain the often delicate choice of the distal integration limit of the power–law method from synthetic deposits produced with the advection–diffusion model Tephra2.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T02:27:59Z
format Journal Article
id ntu-10356/89204
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T02:27:59Z
publishDate 2019
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/892042020-09-26T21:24:42Z A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits Biass, Sébastien Bonadonna, Costanza Houghton, Bruce F. Asian School of the Environment Earth Observatory of Singapore Tephra-fall Deposits Volume Science::Geology This paper describes the step-by-step process of characterizing tephra-fall deposits based on isopach, isomass and isopleth maps as well as thickness transects at different distances from their source. It covers the most frequently used empirical methods of integration (i.e., exponential, power–law and Weibull) and provides a description of the key physical parameters that can be retrieved from tephra-fall deposits. To streamline this process, a Matlab function called TephraFits is proposed, which is highly customizable and also guides the interpretation of the results. The function calculates parameters such as the deposit volume/mass, the VEI/magnitude, and the rates of thickness–decay away from the source and assists in eruption classification using deposit–based schemes. The function also contains a stochastic mode that can be used to propagate the uncertainty from field data to the quantification of eruption source parameters. The use of this function is demonstrated using the the 1180 ±80 years B.P. andesitic subplinian/Plinian tephra deposit Layer 5 of Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador. In addition, we constrain the often delicate choice of the distal integration limit of the power–law method from synthetic deposits produced with the advection–diffusion model Tephra2. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Published version 2019-07-12T03:27:55Z 2019-12-06T17:20:11Z 2019-07-12T03:27:55Z 2019-12-06T17:20:11Z 2019 Journal Article Biass, S., Bonadonna, C., & Houghton, B. F. (2019). A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 8(1), 1-. doi:10.1186/s13617-018-0081-1 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89204 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49316 10.1186/s13617-018-0081-1 en Journal of Applied Volcanology © 2019 The Author(s).Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. 16 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle Tephra-fall Deposits
Volume
Science::Geology
Biass, Sébastien
Bonadonna, Costanza
Houghton, Bruce F.
A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits
title A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits
title_full A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits
title_fullStr A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits
title_full_unstemmed A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits
title_short A step-by-step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra-fall deposits
title_sort step by step evaluation of empirical methods to quantify eruption source parameters from tephra fall deposits
topic Tephra-fall Deposits
Volume
Science::Geology
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/89204
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49316
work_keys_str_mv AT biasssebastien astepbystepevaluationofempiricalmethodstoquantifyeruptionsourceparametersfromtephrafalldeposits
AT bonadonnacostanza astepbystepevaluationofempiricalmethodstoquantifyeruptionsourceparametersfromtephrafalldeposits
AT houghtonbrucef astepbystepevaluationofempiricalmethodstoquantifyeruptionsourceparametersfromtephrafalldeposits
AT biasssebastien stepbystepevaluationofempiricalmethodstoquantifyeruptionsourceparametersfromtephrafalldeposits
AT bonadonnacostanza stepbystepevaluationofempiricalmethodstoquantifyeruptionsourceparametersfromtephrafalldeposits
AT houghtonbrucef stepbystepevaluationofempiricalmethodstoquantifyeruptionsourceparametersfromtephrafalldeposits