Complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors
This study examined the effects of complementary and competitive framing environments on people’s support for and attitudes toward pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) and green energy technologies (GETs). Results suggest that frames have different effects on attitudes and policy support. Relative to...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90100 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48425 |
_version_ | 1826122227590889472 |
---|---|
author | Detenber, Benjamin Hill Ho, Shirley S. Ong, Adeline H. Lim, Nigel W. B. |
author2 | Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet | Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Detenber, Benjamin Hill Ho, Shirley S. Ong, Adeline H. Lim, Nigel W. B. |
author_sort | Detenber, Benjamin Hill |
collection | NTU |
description | This study examined the effects of complementary and competitive framing environments on people’s support for and attitudes toward pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) and green energy technologies (GETs). Results suggest that frames have different effects on attitudes and policy support. Relative to the control group, complementary anti-climate action frames lowered attitudes toward PEBs and GETs. Competitive frames led to attitudes toward GETs that were significantly different from the complementary pro- and anti-frame conditions. For policy support, significant differences were found between the complementary pro- and anti-frames, and between the competitive and complementary pro-climate action frames for PEBs. |
first_indexed | 2024-10-01T05:45:02Z |
format | Journal Article |
id | ntu-10356/90100 |
institution | Nanyang Technological University |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-10-01T05:45:02Z |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ntu-10356/901002024-03-07T00:13:35Z Complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors Detenber, Benjamin Hill Ho, Shirley S. Ong, Adeline H. Lim, Nigel W. B. Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication Framing Theory Climate Change Communication This study examined the effects of complementary and competitive framing environments on people’s support for and attitudes toward pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) and green energy technologies (GETs). Results suggest that frames have different effects on attitudes and policy support. Relative to the control group, complementary anti-climate action frames lowered attitudes toward PEBs and GETs. Competitive frames led to attitudes toward GETs that were significantly different from the complementary pro- and anti-frame conditions. For policy support, significant differences were found between the complementary pro- and anti-frames, and between the competitive and complementary pro-climate action frames for PEBs. Accepted version 2019-05-28T09:14:06Z 2019-12-06T17:40:39Z 2019-05-28T09:14:06Z 2019-12-06T17:40:39Z 2018 Journal Article Detenber, B. H., Ho, S. S., Ong, A. H., & Lim, N. W. B. (2018). Complementary Versus Competitive Framing Effects in the Context of Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors. Science Communication, 40(2), 173-198. doi:10.1177/1075547018758075 1075-5470 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90100 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48425 10.1177/1075547018758075 en Science Communication © 2018 The Author(s). All rights reserved. This paper was published in Science Communication and is made available with permission of The Author(s). 39 p. application/pdf |
spellingShingle | DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication Framing Theory Climate Change Communication Detenber, Benjamin Hill Ho, Shirley S. Ong, Adeline H. Lim, Nigel W. B. Complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors |
title | Complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors |
title_full | Complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors |
title_fullStr | Complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors |
title_full_unstemmed | Complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors |
title_short | Complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors |
title_sort | complementary versus competitive framing effects in the context of pro environmental attitudes and behaviors |
topic | DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication Framing Theory Climate Change Communication |
url | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90100 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT detenberbenjaminhill complementaryversuscompetitiveframingeffectsinthecontextofproenvironmentalattitudesandbehaviors AT hoshirleys complementaryversuscompetitiveframingeffectsinthecontextofproenvironmentalattitudesandbehaviors AT ongadelineh complementaryversuscompetitiveframingeffectsinthecontextofproenvironmentalattitudesandbehaviors AT limnigelwb complementaryversuscompetitiveframingeffectsinthecontextofproenvironmentalattitudesandbehaviors |