Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict

The first ever Indonesian court ruling of convicts as terrorists and the branding of the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) organisation as a "terrorist" one is examined in great detail in this paper. Beginning with the historical development of other counter-terror trials that took place in the Archi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail, Arianti, V., Yang, Jennifer Hui
Other Authors: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90738
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6104
_version_ 1826115313642504192
author Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail
Arianti, V.
Yang, Jennifer Hui
author2 S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
author_facet S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies
Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail
Arianti, V.
Yang, Jennifer Hui
author_sort Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail
collection NTU
description The first ever Indonesian court ruling of convicts as terrorists and the branding of the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) organisation as a "terrorist" one is examined in great detail in this paper. Beginning with the historical development of other counter-terror trials that took place in the Archipelago, it attempts to compare the cases of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih to their precedents and highlights some of its downplayed, but astonishing significances. It also takes a look at the reasons behind the reluctance of the government in banning the JI and suggests possible implications resulting from the verdict.
first_indexed 2024-10-01T03:53:08Z
format Working Paper
id ntu-10356/90738
institution Nanyang Technological University
language English
last_indexed 2024-10-01T03:53:08Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling ntu-10356/907382020-11-01T08:42:39Z Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail Arianti, V. Yang, Jennifer Hui S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies DRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology::Terrorism The first ever Indonesian court ruling of convicts as terrorists and the branding of the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) organisation as a "terrorist" one is examined in great detail in this paper. Beginning with the historical development of other counter-terror trials that took place in the Archipelago, it attempts to compare the cases of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih to their precedents and highlights some of its downplayed, but astonishing significances. It also takes a look at the reasons behind the reluctance of the government in banning the JI and suggests possible implications resulting from the verdict. 2009-09-22T01:43:48Z 2019-12-06T17:53:04Z 2009-09-22T01:43:48Z 2019-12-06T17:53:04Z 2009 2009 Working Paper Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail., Arianti, V., & Yang, J. H. (2009). Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 176). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90738 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6104 en RSIS Working Papers ; 176/09 41 p. application/pdf
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology::Terrorism
Nurfarahislinda Mohamed Ismail
Arianti, V.
Yang, Jennifer Hui
Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict
title Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict
title_full Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict
title_fullStr Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict
title_full_unstemmed Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict
title_short Significance of Abu Dujana and Zarkasih's verdict
title_sort significance of abu dujana and zarkasih s verdict
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology::Terrorism
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90738
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6104
work_keys_str_mv AT nurfarahislindamohamedismail significanceofabudujanaandzarkasihsverdict
AT ariantiv significanceofabudujanaandzarkasihsverdict
AT yangjenniferhui significanceofabudujanaandzarkasihsverdict