PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta)

Destruction or impairment of kidney causes problems on physical ability and strength in such a way that body activities is distracted, so easily tired and weak. For detecting kidney�s disorder, laboratory test on several internal organs is required. On behalf of medical staff, particularly a docto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , NURJAMIYAH, , Dra. Sri Hartati, M.Sc., Ph.D
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012
Subjects:
ETD
Description
Summary:Destruction or impairment of kidney causes problems on physical ability and strength in such a way that body activities is distracted, so easily tired and weak. For detecting kidney�s disorder, laboratory test on several internal organs is required. On behalf of medical staff, particularly a doctor, data of the laboratory tests are analyzed to come into conclusions or decisions pertaining to renal patients. As an initial step of determining renal risk, an accurate analysis is required to verify kidney condition Bayes method is a statistical-mathematical approach enabling us to generate a model of uncertainty for an event, meanwhile AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) is a method enabling us to solve complicated problems with a hierarchical structure and considerations to produce a relative priority scale so that anyone is able to choose the best alternative based on his/her aims. This research came to conclude that the Bayes method could accelerate decision making in determining the risk of renal disease faced by patients. Probability rate shows the confidence system level against the renal disease. Meanwhile the AHP method enables decision makers in getting the information to determine the level of renal disease risks. Thus, the system can be further employed by the medical staff.