PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta)

Destruction or impairment of kidney causes problems on physical ability and strength in such a way that body activities is distracted, so easily tired and weak. For detecting kidney�s disorder, laboratory test on several internal organs is required. On behalf of medical staff, particularly a docto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , NURJAMIYAH, , Dra. Sri Hartati, M.Sc., Ph.D
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012
Subjects:
ETD
_version_ 1797032626648776704
author , NURJAMIYAH
, Dra. Sri Hartati, M.Sc., Ph.D,
author_facet , NURJAMIYAH
, Dra. Sri Hartati, M.Sc., Ph.D,
author_sort , NURJAMIYAH
collection UGM
description Destruction or impairment of kidney causes problems on physical ability and strength in such a way that body activities is distracted, so easily tired and weak. For detecting kidney�s disorder, laboratory test on several internal organs is required. On behalf of medical staff, particularly a doctor, data of the laboratory tests are analyzed to come into conclusions or decisions pertaining to renal patients. As an initial step of determining renal risk, an accurate analysis is required to verify kidney condition Bayes method is a statistical-mathematical approach enabling us to generate a model of uncertainty for an event, meanwhile AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) is a method enabling us to solve complicated problems with a hierarchical structure and considerations to produce a relative priority scale so that anyone is able to choose the best alternative based on his/her aims. This research came to conclude that the Bayes method could accelerate decision making in determining the risk of renal disease faced by patients. Probability rate shows the confidence system level against the renal disease. Meanwhile the AHP method enables decision makers in getting the information to determine the level of renal disease risks. Thus, the system can be further employed by the medical staff.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T22:40:59Z
format Thesis
id oai:generic.eprints.org:100054
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
last_indexed 2024-03-13T22:40:59Z
publishDate 2012
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:1000542016-03-04T08:47:59Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/100054/ PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta) , NURJAMIYAH , Dra. Sri Hartati, M.Sc., Ph.D, ETD Destruction or impairment of kidney causes problems on physical ability and strength in such a way that body activities is distracted, so easily tired and weak. For detecting kidney�s disorder, laboratory test on several internal organs is required. On behalf of medical staff, particularly a doctor, data of the laboratory tests are analyzed to come into conclusions or decisions pertaining to renal patients. As an initial step of determining renal risk, an accurate analysis is required to verify kidney condition Bayes method is a statistical-mathematical approach enabling us to generate a model of uncertainty for an event, meanwhile AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) is a method enabling us to solve complicated problems with a hierarchical structure and considerations to produce a relative priority scale so that anyone is able to choose the best alternative based on his/her aims. This research came to conclude that the Bayes method could accelerate decision making in determining the risk of renal disease faced by patients. Probability rate shows the confidence system level against the renal disease. Meanwhile the AHP method enables decision makers in getting the information to determine the level of renal disease risks. Thus, the system can be further employed by the medical staff. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , NURJAMIYAH and , Dra. Sri Hartati, M.Sc., Ph.D, (2012) PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta). UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=56348
spellingShingle ETD
, NURJAMIYAH
, Dra. Sri Hartati, M.Sc., Ph.D,
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta)
title PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta)
title_full PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta)
title_fullStr PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta)
title_full_unstemmed PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta)
title_short PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN ANTARA METODE PROBABILITAS BAYESIAN DAN METODE AHP DALAM PENENTUAN SESEORANG BERESIKO TERKENA PENYAKIT GINJAL (Studi Kasus: Rumah Sakit Panti Rapih Yogyakarta)
title_sort perbandingan sistem pendukung keputusan antara metode probabilitas bayesian dan metode ahp dalam penentuan seseorang beresiko terkena penyakit ginjal studi kasus rumah sakit panti rapih yogyakarta
topic ETD
work_keys_str_mv AT nurjamiyah perbandingansistempendukungkeputusanantarametodeprobabilitasbayesiandanmetodeahpdalampenentuanseseorangberesikoterkenapenyakitginjalstudikasusrumahsakitpantirapihyogyakarta
AT drasrihartatimscphd perbandingansistempendukungkeputusanantarametodeprobabilitasbayesiandanmetodeahpdalampenentuanseseorangberesikoterkenapenyakitginjalstudikasusrumahsakitpantirapihyogyakarta