Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan (Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat)
Law enforcement against abuse of dominance in Antimonopoli Act of Indonesia needs Rule of Reason as analytical method. The inquiries determines the existence of dominance and the existence of abuse of dominance. Indication of the existences, such as: measurement of definition of relevant market, mar...
| Principais autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Tese |
| Publicado em: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Assuntos: |
| _version_ | 1826045838163443712 |
|---|---|
| author | , VEGITYA RAMADHANI-PUTRI, SH, S.ANT , Prof. M. Hawin, S.H., LL.M., Ph. D. |
| author_facet | , VEGITYA RAMADHANI-PUTRI, SH, S.ANT , Prof. M. Hawin, S.H., LL.M., Ph. D. |
| author_sort | , VEGITYA RAMADHANI-PUTRI, SH, S.ANT |
| collection | UGM |
| description | Law enforcement against abuse of dominance in Antimonopoli Act of Indonesia
needs Rule of Reason as analytical method. The inquiries determines the existence of
dominance and the existence of abuse of dominance. Indication of the existences, such as:
measurement of definition of relevant market, market power, market consentration, market
share, and entry barriers. Accordingly, the indicators of abuse of dominance are
dependentcy among competitors, harms or damages on competitors, effects on consumers,
and disinsentives for others counterparts, qualitatively as well as quantitatively.
Abuse of dominance that regulated at Competition Law in European Communities
based on Article 82 Rome Treaty. According Article 82 Rome Treaty, any abuse by one or
more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial
part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market insofar as it may
affect trade between EC Member States. Such abuse may, in particular, consist in: (a)
directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading
conditions |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:43:48Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:100765 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:43:48Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:1007652016-03-04T08:49:16Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/100765/ Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan (Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat) , VEGITYA RAMADHANI-PUTRI, SH, S.ANT , Prof. M. Hawin, S.H., LL.M., Ph. D. ETD Law enforcement against abuse of dominance in Antimonopoli Act of Indonesia needs Rule of Reason as analytical method. The inquiries determines the existence of dominance and the existence of abuse of dominance. Indication of the existences, such as: measurement of definition of relevant market, market power, market consentration, market share, and entry barriers. Accordingly, the indicators of abuse of dominance are dependentcy among competitors, harms or damages on competitors, effects on consumers, and disinsentives for others counterparts, qualitatively as well as quantitatively. Abuse of dominance that regulated at Competition Law in European Communities based on Article 82 Rome Treaty. According Article 82 Rome Treaty, any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market insofar as it may affect trade between EC Member States. Such abuse may, in particular, consist in: (a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , VEGITYA RAMADHANI-PUTRI, SH, S.ANT and , Prof. M. Hawin, S.H., LL.M., Ph. D. (2012) Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan (Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat). UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=57052 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , VEGITYA RAMADHANI-PUTRI, SH, S.ANT , Prof. M. Hawin, S.H., LL.M., Ph. D. Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan (Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat) |
| title | Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan
(Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat) |
| title_full | Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan
(Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat) |
| title_fullStr | Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan
(Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan
(Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat) |
| title_short | Analisis Rule of Reason terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan
(Studi Komparatif: Indonesia, Uni Eropa, dan Amerika Serikat) |
| title_sort | analisis rule of reason terhadap penyalahgunaan posisi dominan studi komparatif indonesia uni eropa dan amerika serikat |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vegityaramadhaniputrishsant analisisruleofreasonterhadappenyalahgunaanposisidominanstudikomparatifindonesiaunieropadanamerikaserikat AT profmhawinshllmphd analisisruleofreasonterhadappenyalahgunaanposisidominanstudikomparatifindonesiaunieropadanamerikaserikat |