Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns

Real-time pore water pressure measurements have been made automatically and continuously with tensiometer (GT), thermal conductivity (TC) and capacitance (MP) sensors in laboratory compacted clay columns. Although GT, TC and MP sensors have been commonly used in many applications, there has rarely...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Indrawan, I.G.B, Williams, D.J., Scheuermann, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CRC Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/101158/1/i_gde_budi_indrawan-Comparison%20of%20Tensiometer...pdf
_version_ 1797032852961886208
author Indrawan, I.G.B
Williams, D.J.
Scheuermann, A.
author_facet Indrawan, I.G.B
Williams, D.J.
Scheuermann, A.
author_sort Indrawan, I.G.B
collection UGM
description Real-time pore water pressure measurements have been made automatically and continuously with tensiometer (GT), thermal conductivity (TC) and capacitance (MP) sensors in laboratory compacted clay columns. Although GT, TC and MP sensors have been commonly used in many applications, there has rarely been any attempt to compare the measurements made by the different sensors or to evaluate their long-term performance, especially for application in compacted clay in a high salinity environment and under a high hydraulic gradient. In this study, GT, TC and MP sensors were calibrated and subsequently installed at various elevations in 303 mm diameter by 300 mm high compacted clay columns subjected to wetting by a 100 kPa saline water pressure, followed by subsequent drying. The calibration and measurement results showed that the GT sensors allowed measurements not only of negative pore water pressure, but also of positive pore water pressure. While the GT sensors allowed the measurement of pore water pressure down to -80 kPa, the TC and MP sensors were able to measure much higher negative pore water pressures. The TC and MP sensors were, however, found to have large sensor-to-sensor variations, hysteretic behaviour upon drying and wetting, and slow equilibration times. Unlike the GT and TC sensors, the long-term performance of the MP sensors was found to be affected by the salinity of the compacted clay.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T22:44:59Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:101158
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T22:44:59Z
publishDate 2014
publisher CRC Press
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:1011582015-02-25T07:22:38Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/101158/ Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns Indrawan, I.G.B Williams, D.J. Scheuermann, A. Geology Real-time pore water pressure measurements have been made automatically and continuously with tensiometer (GT), thermal conductivity (TC) and capacitance (MP) sensors in laboratory compacted clay columns. Although GT, TC and MP sensors have been commonly used in many applications, there has rarely been any attempt to compare the measurements made by the different sensors or to evaluate their long-term performance, especially for application in compacted clay in a high salinity environment and under a high hydraulic gradient. In this study, GT, TC and MP sensors were calibrated and subsequently installed at various elevations in 303 mm diameter by 300 mm high compacted clay columns subjected to wetting by a 100 kPa saline water pressure, followed by subsequent drying. The calibration and measurement results showed that the GT sensors allowed measurements not only of negative pore water pressure, but also of positive pore water pressure. While the GT sensors allowed the measurement of pore water pressure down to -80 kPa, the TC and MP sensors were able to measure much higher negative pore water pressures. The TC and MP sensors were, however, found to have large sensor-to-sensor variations, hysteretic behaviour upon drying and wetting, and slow equilibration times. Unlike the GT and TC sensors, the long-term performance of the MP sensors was found to be affected by the salinity of the compacted clay. CRC Press 2014-07-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repository.ugm.ac.id/101158/1/i_gde_budi_indrawan-Comparison%20of%20Tensiometer...pdf Indrawan, I.G.B and Williams, D.J. and Scheuermann, A. (2014) Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Unsat 2014, Sydney, Australia, 2. pp. 1587-1596. ISSN 987-1-138-00150-3
spellingShingle Geology
Indrawan, I.G.B
Williams, D.J.
Scheuermann, A.
Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns
title Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns
title_full Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns
title_fullStr Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns
title_short Comparison of tensiometer. Thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns
title_sort comparison of tensiometer thermal conductivity and capacitance sensor measurements of pore water pressure in compacted clay columns
topic Geology
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/101158/1/i_gde_budi_indrawan-Comparison%20of%20Tensiometer...pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT indrawanigb comparisonoftensiometerthermalconductivityandcapacitancesensormeasurementsofporewaterpressureincompactedclaycolumns
AT williamsdj comparisonoftensiometerthermalconductivityandcapacitancesensormeasurementsofporewaterpressureincompactedclaycolumns
AT scheuermanna comparisonoftensiometerthermalconductivityandcapacitancesensormeasurementsofporewaterpressureincompactedclaycolumns