Summary: | This research aims (1) to gain knowledge about the importance of Visum et
Repertum in the proof of the act Abortion Provocatus Criminalis and (2) to gain
knowledge about the views of judges on Visum Et Repertum well as the impact of the
Visum Et Repertum to prove the act of Abortion Provocatus Ciminalis in court.
This type of research is empirical juridical, which is a method of approach
that emphasizes the legal theories and rules of law relating to the problems in
accurately by examining secondary data prior to then proceed to conduct a study of
primary data in the field, then data were analyzed, so that the results of the discussion
and conclusions reached are rational and objective.
The results showed that attached the Visum Et Repertum in an abortion case file
on the dosser examination by the investigators or the stage of examination of the
claim by the General prosecutor, then brought to trial, the evidence Visum Et
Repertum be included as valid evidence as stated in article 184 paragraph (1) sub.b
and sub.3 Criminal Code, which if set forth in the form of letters, then it will go in the
third evidence is the letter. Presence of Visum Et Repertum Visum useful to law
enforcement officials, in particular for making light of a judge in a criminal case, but
the Court of course that by understanding the limits and freedoms guaranteed by a
Judge of the Act, which means that once Judge times are not required to comply with
the expert opinion when the opinion is given it is contrary to his beliefs. The presence
of Visum Et Repertum binding as a means of evidence, but does not force the judge.
Binding of a judge of Visum Et Repertum can be ruled out if possible to make the
visum little possibility.
|