PERILAKU LENTUR BALOK KOMPOSIT CASTELLATEDBUKAAN HEKSAGONAL DISELIMUTI MORTAR

Composite structural element are often used in several years ago, which have a main weakness, expensive. IWF section is commonly used in this case. To solve the expensive problem, utilizing the castellated beam can be used to subtitute IWF section. The castellated beam is made from enhancing the dep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , Juli Ardita Pribadi. R, , Akhmad Aminullah, S.T., M.T., Ph.D
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013
Subjects:
ETD
Description
Summary:Composite structural element are often used in several years ago, which have a main weakness, expensive. IWF section is commonly used in this case. To solve the expensive problem, utilizing the castellated beam can be used to subtitute IWF section. The castellated beam is made from enhancing the depth of IWF section, but have a higher flexural capacity than IWF section. If this two system are combined into a composite catellated, then will be capable to solve the weakness on each system. This research objectives is to investigate the flexural behavior of composite castellated beam with hexagonal opening encase with mortar. The test using two speciments, castellated beam and composite beam. Composite beam is composed from composite section which encase with mortar. Mortar mix design used in this research have a weight ratio 1:1.5, and water-cement ratio 0.4 and admixture viscocrete 0.7% from cement weight. Test method using static loading in two point, and designed have a flexure failure mode. Research result show increasing in flexural capacity from composite beam about 229% from castellated beam. Failure mode wich occur is different for each specimens.On composite beam, occur a lateral buckling failure, whereas on castellated beam lateral torsional buckling was occured. With adding mortar, the behaviour of castellated section stability is increased because along the beam span was restrained by mortar. Using composite beam is not efficient in weight, because it�s moment ratio bigger than 1,09%, eventhough it�s more efficient in price, because the price ratio is less than comparable beam which has a capacity equivalent.