| Summary: | The writing of this thesis aims to examine the application of the implementation
of the office of notary public notary office not so if a working area with office of PPAT.
See the office of Notary and PPAT implementation in concrete or through practice and
associated with the provision of the content of the regulations
This research includes empirical juridical research, that the approach to the
problem by examining the phenomenon in the problems encountered in the research
associated with the regulations. Field research is carried out by means of an interview
by using the tool in the form of guidelines for interviewing primary and secondary data
are analyzed qualitatively by systematically compiled and analyzed based on the
inductive method is drawn in a conclusion of each formulation problems.
The results of research on a duplicate notary offices, and a different position
where the PPAT but still in one region, in practice unenforceable because has no Office
or seat caused by the difference in terms of article 17 the letter g of act No. 30/2004 and
article 8 subsection (2) letter c government regulations No. 37 1998. So that
implementation in the real term could not be implemented. As a result, did not run in the
real post office arising from the violation of sanctions in the form of administrative :
oral reprimand
|
|---|