DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH
This study investigates derogation and euphemization strategies used by the characters in �Crash�. In the case of writing, there is number of aims of this study. Firstly, it aims to describe the use of derogation strategy. Secondly, it aims to describe the use of euphemization strategy. Thirdly,...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797033175197679616 |
|---|---|
| author | , AGWIN DEGAF , Prof. Dr. Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo, |
| author_facet | , AGWIN DEGAF , Prof. Dr. Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo, |
| author_sort | , AGWIN DEGAF |
| collection | UGM |
| description | This study investigates derogation and euphemization strategies used by
the characters in �Crash�. In the case of writing, there is number of aims of this
study. Firstly, it aims to describe the use of derogation strategy. Secondly, it aims
to describe the use of euphemization strategy. Thirdly, it aims to describes
function of derogation and euphemization strategies used by the characters in
�Crash�. The data source of this study is �Crash�. From the data source, the
researcher analyzes and investigates the utterances used by the characters in the
film based on time sequence appearance which is dealing with derogation and
euphemization as the data.
This study uses descriptive qualitative approach, since it analyze the data
in the form of utterances descriptively based on derogation and euphemization
strategies found in the film. It attempt to describe phenomena that happen in
human life and it is hard to measure the data quantitatively since the data are in
the form of words, utterances, or conversations. In relation to derogation and
euphemization, Van Dijk's framework consists of two main discursive strategies
of 'positive self-representation' (strategy of in-group favoritism) and 'negative
other-representation' (strategy of derogation of out-group) ''which are materialized
through some discursive moves. The result of this study shows that there are
several derogation and euphemization strategies used by characters in Crash film.
First, the derogation strategy is used through some discursive moves such
as: actor description, consensus, empathy, evidentiality, humanitarianism,
implication, norm expression, number game, and disclaimer. Second, the
euphemization strategy is used through some discursive moves such as: actor
description, authority, consensus, self-glorification, polarization, and illustration.
Those discursive moves are manifested through the use of a particular lexicon
where it indicates how someone makes the choice of words on the word
possibilities that are available. Third, the use of derogatory and euphemism words
certainly can not be separated from the reason why these words are used, it is
associated with the function. Generally, the function of derogation is to humiliate
the opponent, emotive reaction to the anger, disappointment, or something
unexpected and undesirable, thus eventually bringing the addressee into disrepute.
Related to euphemization strategy, the functions found in the data include: hide
the facts, show respect, satirize, showing concern, convey information, criticize,
and warned. that where such functions are used to provide positive label in-group
favoritism. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:50:03Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:119549 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T22:50:03Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:1195492016-03-04T08:21:28Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/119549/ DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH , AGWIN DEGAF , Prof. Dr. Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo, ETD This study investigates derogation and euphemization strategies used by the characters in �Crash�. In the case of writing, there is number of aims of this study. Firstly, it aims to describe the use of derogation strategy. Secondly, it aims to describe the use of euphemization strategy. Thirdly, it aims to describes function of derogation and euphemization strategies used by the characters in �Crash�. The data source of this study is �Crash�. From the data source, the researcher analyzes and investigates the utterances used by the characters in the film based on time sequence appearance which is dealing with derogation and euphemization as the data. This study uses descriptive qualitative approach, since it analyze the data in the form of utterances descriptively based on derogation and euphemization strategies found in the film. It attempt to describe phenomena that happen in human life and it is hard to measure the data quantitatively since the data are in the form of words, utterances, or conversations. In relation to derogation and euphemization, Van Dijk's framework consists of two main discursive strategies of 'positive self-representation' (strategy of in-group favoritism) and 'negative other-representation' (strategy of derogation of out-group) ''which are materialized through some discursive moves. The result of this study shows that there are several derogation and euphemization strategies used by characters in Crash film. First, the derogation strategy is used through some discursive moves such as: actor description, consensus, empathy, evidentiality, humanitarianism, implication, norm expression, number game, and disclaimer. Second, the euphemization strategy is used through some discursive moves such as: actor description, authority, consensus, self-glorification, polarization, and illustration. Those discursive moves are manifested through the use of a particular lexicon where it indicates how someone makes the choice of words on the word possibilities that are available. Third, the use of derogatory and euphemism words certainly can not be separated from the reason why these words are used, it is associated with the function. Generally, the function of derogation is to humiliate the opponent, emotive reaction to the anger, disappointment, or something unexpected and undesirable, thus eventually bringing the addressee into disrepute. Related to euphemization strategy, the functions found in the data include: hide the facts, show respect, satirize, showing concern, convey information, criticize, and warned. that where such functions are used to provide positive label in-group favoritism. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , AGWIN DEGAF and , Prof. Dr. Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo, (2013) DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=59552 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , AGWIN DEGAF , Prof. Dr. Soepomo Poedjosoedarmo, DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH |
| title | DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH |
| title_full | DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH |
| title_fullStr | DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH |
| title_full_unstemmed | DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH |
| title_short | DEROGASI DAN EUFEMISASI PADA CRASH |
| title_sort | derogasi dan eufemisasi pada crash |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT agwindegaf derogasidaneufemisasipadacrash AT profdrsoepomopoedjosoedarmo derogasidaneufemisasipadacrash |