| Summary: | The purpose of this research is to get a clear idea of the administrative
procedure and governance of Public Notary office at Yogyakarta city, and to
review the guidance and control of administrative procedure and governance of Public Notary office by Yogyakarta Local Supervisory Board.
The nature of the research is yuridis empirical which is a form of approach
on the respondent and source person matters, by analyzing the valid legal norms in its relation to the phenomenon of the matter arises during the research. The research was conducted at Yogyakarta city. Data source utilized are primer data, by interview method and secondary data, by library research. Data collection was conducted by non random sampling by utilizing purposes sampling, which was collected by paying attention to few criteria according to the objects that meets the purpose of the research. Data gathered was analyzed by qualitative method, by describing and detailing the subject according to the matters related to the result of the research.
The conduct of administrative procedure and governance at Public Notary
office is not according to the Law Number 30 of 2004 Year regarding the Public
Notary yet. The research meets few finding on the misconduct of the
administrative procedure and governance at Public Notary office that violets of
Law Number 30 of 2004 Year regarding the Public Notary Profession. Violated
article is Article 16 point 1 letter f, g, h, i, and j. Control of the administrative
procedure and governance at Public Notary office was conducted by Local
Supervisory Board by scheduled an annual checking on the Public Notary
protocol once a year. The guidance would be given by Local Supervisory Board in the form of suggestion on the issues to be improved and correction in case any misconduct happened when Public Notary carried out this duties. The violation of Law Public Notary Profession that was found during the checking are subjected for sanction according to Article 85 Public Notary Profession.
|
|---|