| Summary: | Settlement is one of the basic human needs. Settlement areas generally
have certain characteristics. Merapi Volcano is one of the most active volcano in
the world. Some of its teritory are in the disaster prone area, so they do not fit for
habitation. In fact many people are living in the slopes of Merapi. Post eruption of
Merapi 2010 the local government attempted to relocate residents who reside in
the prone-areas. Howewer three of nine villages where i the prone areas rejected
the scenario. This research was done in three villages which reject the relocation
program. These three villages are Srunen, Kalitengah Kidul and Kalitengah Lor.
There are two purrposes of the research. The first is to describe the
resilience settled of community in disaster prone areas. The second is to
determine the factors that influence the resilience settled of community in disater
prone areas.
The method of this research is inductive qualitative with descriptive
analysis. This research used phenomenological approach, which tried to interpret
and make sense of the phenomena that found in the field. Finally, the synthesis
process tried to make abstration in a concept.
Result and conclusion of this research can be abstracted in the concept of
\"ayem tentrem: urip nyanding Merapi\" it mean that living a calm, peaceful with
everything completely guaranteed (secure) including livelihood, socio-cultural
circumstances, the relationship with the natural environment and most
importantly comfortable feeling which associated with the psychology condition
of community. \"Nyanding Merapi\" means coexisting with Merapi, Merapi is
considered not as an opponent but a comrade. Resilience settled of communities
in disaster prone area covers economic resilience, social resilience and
environmental resilience (disasters) in which strongly associated with the local
wisdom. Merapi society is able to coexist with nature and able to survive in
disaster prone areas. Factors that influence the resilience settled of community in
disaster prone areas are the hometown factors. This factors include the origin
livelihood, livable area, homeland hereditary guarded, spirit and comfort of live.
Strong Pattern of rural and bond with nature is difficult to be changed. Livelihood
resources related to their occupation as cattleman and farmer. Strong Pattern of
rural, bond with nature, livelihood resources and their assets in hometown have
pushed people to survive settled in disaster prone areas.
|
|---|