PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING, GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH, DAN BONE LEVEL (Kajian secara Ex Post Facto)
Background. A successful implant is indicated by the presence of no infection and the annual loss of alveolar bone occurs less than 0.2 mm after the first year of implants installation. This research was conducted based on the existence of implant diameter differences, the number and distance betwee...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797033941170913280 |
|---|---|
| author | , Pandu Kridalaksana , Prof. Dr. drg. Sudibyo, SU., Sp. Perio(K) |
| author_facet | , Pandu Kridalaksana , Prof. Dr. drg. Sudibyo, SU., Sp. Perio(K) |
| author_sort | , Pandu Kridalaksana |
| collection | UGM |
| description | Background. A successful implant is indicated by the presence of no
infection and the annual loss of alveolar bone occurs less than 0.2 mm after the
first year of implants installation. This research was conducted based on the
existence of implant diameter differences, the number and distance between the
screws, and the form of abutment of mini implant compared to a standard implant.
Inflammations on peri-implant can be seen in the gingiva and peri-implant sulcus.
The presence of infection and the loss of alveolar bone, then research on the
success of the use of mini implant and standard implant by measuring and
observing the number of bleeding on probing, gingival index, pocket depth, bone
level were needed.
This research was aimed to find out the differences in the success of the
mini implant usage compared to standard implant to the existence bleeding on
probing, gingival index, pocket depth, and bone level. This research employed Ex
Post Facto methodology by measuring and observing bleeding on probing,
gingival index, pocket depth, and bone level on the subject that used mini implant
with standard implant.
Result of observation. Bleeding on probing on all mini implant (MDI)
group were negative, while on all standard implant (Q-Implants) group were
positive, Chi-Square test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05). Average gingival index on MDI
group was 0.67 ± 0.24 and Q-Implants was 1.32 ± 0.50, t test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05).
Average pocket depth on MDI mesial group was 1.80 ± 0.63 and Q-Implants was
3.70 ± 0.48, t test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05). Average pocket depth on MDI distal group
was 2.00 ± 0.21 and Q-Implants was 3.50 ± 0.27, t test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05). Average
bone level on MDI mesial group was 0.52 ± 0.27 and Q-Implants was 0.93 ± 0.40,
t test, p= 0.01 (p<0.05). Average bone level on MDI distal group was 0.48 ± 0.07
and Q-Implants was 1.05 ± 0.10, t test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05).
Conclusion. Research result from examination of bleeding on probing,
gingival index, pocket depth, and bone level showed a smaller number on mini
implant compared with standard implant. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:02:51Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:123296 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:02:51Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:1232962016-03-04T08:41:53Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/123296/ PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING, GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH, DAN BONE LEVEL (Kajian secara Ex Post Facto) , Pandu Kridalaksana , Prof. Dr. drg. Sudibyo, SU., Sp. Perio(K) ETD Background. A successful implant is indicated by the presence of no infection and the annual loss of alveolar bone occurs less than 0.2 mm after the first year of implants installation. This research was conducted based on the existence of implant diameter differences, the number and distance between the screws, and the form of abutment of mini implant compared to a standard implant. Inflammations on peri-implant can be seen in the gingiva and peri-implant sulcus. The presence of infection and the loss of alveolar bone, then research on the success of the use of mini implant and standard implant by measuring and observing the number of bleeding on probing, gingival index, pocket depth, bone level were needed. This research was aimed to find out the differences in the success of the mini implant usage compared to standard implant to the existence bleeding on probing, gingival index, pocket depth, and bone level. This research employed Ex Post Facto methodology by measuring and observing bleeding on probing, gingival index, pocket depth, and bone level on the subject that used mini implant with standard implant. Result of observation. Bleeding on probing on all mini implant (MDI) group were negative, while on all standard implant (Q-Implants) group were positive, Chi-Square test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05). Average gingival index on MDI group was 0.67 ± 0.24 and Q-Implants was 1.32 ± 0.50, t test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05). Average pocket depth on MDI mesial group was 1.80 ± 0.63 and Q-Implants was 3.70 ± 0.48, t test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05). Average pocket depth on MDI distal group was 2.00 ± 0.21 and Q-Implants was 3.50 ± 0.27, t test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05). Average bone level on MDI mesial group was 0.52 ± 0.27 and Q-Implants was 0.93 ± 0.40, t test, p= 0.01 (p<0.05). Average bone level on MDI distal group was 0.48 ± 0.07 and Q-Implants was 1.05 ± 0.10, t test, p= 0.00 (p<0.05). Conclusion. Research result from examination of bleeding on probing, gingival index, pocket depth, and bone level showed a smaller number on mini implant compared with standard implant. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Pandu Kridalaksana and , Prof. Dr. drg. Sudibyo, SU., Sp. Perio(K) (2013) PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING, GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH, DAN BONE LEVEL (Kajian secara Ex Post Facto). UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=63407 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , Pandu Kridalaksana , Prof. Dr. drg. Sudibyo, SU., Sp. Perio(K) PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING, GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH, DAN BONE LEVEL (Kajian secara Ex Post Facto) |
| title | PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN
IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING,
GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH,
DAN BONE LEVEL
(Kajian secara Ex Post Facto) |
| title_full | PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN
IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING,
GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH,
DAN BONE LEVEL
(Kajian secara Ex Post Facto) |
| title_fullStr | PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN
IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING,
GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH,
DAN BONE LEVEL
(Kajian secara Ex Post Facto) |
| title_full_unstemmed | PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN
IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING,
GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH,
DAN BONE LEVEL
(Kajian secara Ex Post Facto) |
| title_short | PERBEDAAN PEMAKAIAN ANTARA IMPLAN MINI DAN
IMPLAN STANDAR PADA BLEEDING ON PROBING,
GINGIVAL INDEX, POCKET DEPTH,
DAN BONE LEVEL
(Kajian secara Ex Post Facto) |
| title_sort | perbedaan pemakaian antara implan mini dan implan standar pada bleeding on probing gingival index pocket depth dan bone level kajian secara ex post facto |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pandukridalaksana perbedaanpemakaianantaraimplanminidanimplanstandarpadableedingonprobinggingivalindexpocketdepthdanbonelevelkajiansecaraexpostfacto AT profdrdrgsudibyosuspperiok perbedaanpemakaianantaraimplanminidanimplanstandarpadableedingonprobinggingivalindexpocketdepthdanbonelevelkajiansecaraexpostfacto |