TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997
This study entitles The Responsibility of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) on the Land Deed Made (A Case Study of the Verdict of State Court Banjarmasin No. 07/PDT.G/ PN.BJM) Dated on March 28, 1997. The purposes of the study are to find out the responsibility of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) on the la...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797033950746509312 |
|---|---|
| author | , Miming Yuliati , Prof. Dr. H. Abdul Ghofur Anshori, S.H.,M.H., |
| author_facet | , Miming Yuliati , Prof. Dr. H. Abdul Ghofur Anshori, S.H.,M.H., |
| author_sort | , Miming Yuliati |
| collection | UGM |
| description | This study entitles The Responsibility of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) on
the Land Deed Made (A Case Study of the Verdict of State Court Banjarmasin No.
07/PDT.G/ PN.BJM) Dated on March 28, 1997. The purposes of the study are to
find out the responsibility of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) on the land deed that
was made and canceled by the verdict of the State Court and to find out the legal
protection provided for PPAT in performing the official tasks.
The study was conducted using a normative juridical method categorized
as a doctrinal legal writting. It was based on literature research of legal principles,
legal rules, and the systematics of law. In the study, there were two types of data,
i.e. primary and secondary data. The primary data were obtained from literature
study, while secondary data were obtained from field interview. The former was
done by a documentary study, while the latter was done through semi-structured
interview. The data collected were analyzed by a qualitative technique.
Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the Land Deed
Official (PPAT) has no responsibility over anything in the cancelation of the land
deed made. However, it had moral burden due to the land deed made, because the
underlying factors of the cancelation was the bad will of befendant to the Land
Deed Official (PPAT) so there was a party that felt to be harmed. The Land Deed
Official (PPAT) should have the responsivility both personal and administrative
level if it was proven to do any mistakes or ignorance in making the land deed. In
the study, the Land Deed Official was not imposed by personal and administrative
sanctions or criminal sanction because the mistakes in the making of the land deed
official was from the applicant to be made the land deed. Meanwhile, in providing
the legal protection for the Land Deed Official in the implementation of their daily
tasks, the engagement of building and supervision by IPPAT, the Head of
Territorial Office, and the Head of Land Office is very necessary to minimize any
mistakes that can likely occur in the making of land deed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:03:03Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:123344 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:03:03Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:1233442016-03-04T08:40:47Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/123344/ TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997 , Miming Yuliati , Prof. Dr. H. Abdul Ghofur Anshori, S.H.,M.H., ETD This study entitles The Responsibility of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) on the Land Deed Made (A Case Study of the Verdict of State Court Banjarmasin No. 07/PDT.G/ PN.BJM) Dated on March 28, 1997. The purposes of the study are to find out the responsibility of the Land Deed Official (PPAT) on the land deed that was made and canceled by the verdict of the State Court and to find out the legal protection provided for PPAT in performing the official tasks. The study was conducted using a normative juridical method categorized as a doctrinal legal writting. It was based on literature research of legal principles, legal rules, and the systematics of law. In the study, there were two types of data, i.e. primary and secondary data. The primary data were obtained from literature study, while secondary data were obtained from field interview. The former was done by a documentary study, while the latter was done through semi-structured interview. The data collected were analyzed by a qualitative technique. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the Land Deed Official (PPAT) has no responsibility over anything in the cancelation of the land deed made. However, it had moral burden due to the land deed made, because the underlying factors of the cancelation was the bad will of befendant to the Land Deed Official (PPAT) so there was a party that felt to be harmed. The Land Deed Official (PPAT) should have the responsivility both personal and administrative level if it was proven to do any mistakes or ignorance in making the land deed. In the study, the Land Deed Official was not imposed by personal and administrative sanctions or criminal sanction because the mistakes in the making of the land deed official was from the applicant to be made the land deed. Meanwhile, in providing the legal protection for the Land Deed Official in the implementation of their daily tasks, the engagement of building and supervision by IPPAT, the Head of Territorial Office, and the Head of Land Office is very necessary to minimize any mistakes that can likely occur in the making of land deed. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Miming Yuliati and , Prof. Dr. H. Abdul Ghofur Anshori, S.H.,M.H., (2013) TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=63455 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , Miming Yuliati , Prof. Dr. H. Abdul Ghofur Anshori, S.H.,M.H., TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997 |
| title | TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997 |
| title_full | TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997 |
| title_fullStr | TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997 |
| title_full_unstemmed | TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997 |
| title_short | TANGGUNG JAWAB PPAT TERHADAP AKTA YANG TELAH DIBUATNYA (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin Nomor 07/PDT.G/1997/PN.BJM) TANGGAL 28 MARET 1997 |
| title_sort | tanggung jawab ppat terhadap akta yang telah dibuatnya studi kasus putusan pengadilan negeri banjarmasin nomor 07 pdt g 1997 pn bjm tanggal 28 maret 1997 |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mimingyuliati tanggungjawabppatterhadapaktayangtelahdibuatnyastudikasusputusanpengadilannegeribanjarmasinnomor07pdtg1997pnbjmtanggal28maret1997 AT profdrhabdulghofuranshorishmh tanggungjawabppatterhadapaktayangtelahdibuatnyastudikasusputusanpengadilannegeribanjarmasinnomor07pdtg1997pnbjmtanggal28maret1997 |