PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE

In 1952 Markowitz pioneered the use of Mean-Variance method for portfolio optimization problems, for which Mean-Variance method is very popular to use. However, Mean-Variance method has drawbacks that the return data should be normal distributed. In fact, it is very difficult to get data that has no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , SEPTI WAHYUNI, , Yunita Wulansari, S.Si., M.Sc.
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013
Subjects:
ETD
_version_ 1797034052868374528
author , SEPTI WAHYUNI
, Yunita Wulansari, S.Si., M.Sc.
author_facet , SEPTI WAHYUNI
, Yunita Wulansari, S.Si., M.Sc.
author_sort , SEPTI WAHYUNI
collection UGM
description In 1952 Markowitz pioneered the use of Mean-Variance method for portfolio optimization problems, for which Mean-Variance method is very popular to use. However, Mean-Variance method has drawbacks that the return data should be normal distributed. In fact, it is very difficult to get data that has normal distributed return. Markowitz (1959) argued that �analysis based on semivariance tend to produce better portfolios than those based on variance�. However, why is the analysis of the portfolio with Mean-Variance more often used than Mean-Semivariance? This is because, unlike covariance matrix that is symmetric and exogenous, semicovariance matrix is asymmetric and endogenous. Thus in calculating the weights, numerical algorithms must be used that is rarely used by practitioners and academics. Therefore, heuristic approach used which fuction to change semicovariance matrix to be symmetric and exogenous. So calculating the weights of Mean-Semivariance portfolio could use the same with Mean-Variance portfolio. Portfolio optimization using Mean-Semivariance does not require any distribution assumptions, making it much easier to use than Mean-Variance. The calculations are easy and with heuristic approach obtained semicovariance matrix which has the same form and finishing with covariance matrix of Mean-Variance. In this thesis the empirical comparison will be made between Mean-Semivariance portfolio optimization with Mean-Variance portfolio optimization. Then in case studies portfolio formation carried out Mean-Variance portfolio and Mean- Semivariance portfolio with combination of multiple financial assets.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T23:04:58Z
format Thesis
id oai:generic.eprints.org:123842
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
last_indexed 2024-03-13T23:04:58Z
publishDate 2013
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:1238422016-03-04T08:43:09Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/123842/ PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE , SEPTI WAHYUNI , Yunita Wulansari, S.Si., M.Sc. ETD In 1952 Markowitz pioneered the use of Mean-Variance method for portfolio optimization problems, for which Mean-Variance method is very popular to use. However, Mean-Variance method has drawbacks that the return data should be normal distributed. In fact, it is very difficult to get data that has normal distributed return. Markowitz (1959) argued that �analysis based on semivariance tend to produce better portfolios than those based on variance�. However, why is the analysis of the portfolio with Mean-Variance more often used than Mean-Semivariance? This is because, unlike covariance matrix that is symmetric and exogenous, semicovariance matrix is asymmetric and endogenous. Thus in calculating the weights, numerical algorithms must be used that is rarely used by practitioners and academics. Therefore, heuristic approach used which fuction to change semicovariance matrix to be symmetric and exogenous. So calculating the weights of Mean-Semivariance portfolio could use the same with Mean-Variance portfolio. Portfolio optimization using Mean-Semivariance does not require any distribution assumptions, making it much easier to use than Mean-Variance. The calculations are easy and with heuristic approach obtained semicovariance matrix which has the same form and finishing with covariance matrix of Mean-Variance. In this thesis the empirical comparison will be made between Mean-Semivariance portfolio optimization with Mean-Variance portfolio optimization. Then in case studies portfolio formation carried out Mean-Variance portfolio and Mean- Semivariance portfolio with combination of multiple financial assets. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , SEPTI WAHYUNI and , Yunita Wulansari, S.Si., M.Sc. (2013) PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=63958
spellingShingle ETD
, SEPTI WAHYUNI
, Yunita Wulansari, S.Si., M.Sc.
PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE
title PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE
title_full PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE
title_fullStr PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE
title_full_unstemmed PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE
title_short PERBANDINGAN OPTIMISASI PORTOFOLIO METODE MEAN- VARIANCE DENGAN METODE MEAN-SEMIVARIANCE
title_sort perbandingan optimisasi portofolio metode mean variance dengan metode mean semivariance
topic ETD
work_keys_str_mv AT septiwahyuni perbandinganoptimisasiportofoliometodemeanvariancedenganmetodemeansemivariance
AT yunitawulansarissimsc perbandinganoptimisasiportofoliometodemeanvariancedenganmetodemeansemivariance