PERBEDAAN STATUS KEBERSIHAN MULUT DAN KESEHATAN GINGIVA ANTARA ANAK DI DAERAH DENGAN KESADAHAN AIR TINGGI DAN KESADAHAN AIR RENDAH (Kajian pada Siswa SDN Kepuh dan SDN 2 Kanoman Kecamatan Panjatan Kulon Progo)

Water with high hardness has high calcium content. Calcium is an inorganic substance which is a main component of calculus formation. Children lives in an area of high water hardness and consumes it daily has a bigger chance of calculus accumulation in a tooth surface. Dental plaque is a main factor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , CHRISTIA AYE W V, , drg. Prayitno, SU.
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013
Subjects:
ETD
Description
Summary:Water with high hardness has high calcium content. Calcium is an inorganic substance which is a main component of calculus formation. Children lives in an area of high water hardness and consumes it daily has a bigger chance of calculus accumulation in a tooth surface. Dental plaque is a main factor cause of gingivitis. Calculus can increase plaque retention in a tooth surface. The presence of calculus deposit, debris, and plaque in a tooth surface can affect oral hygiene status and gingival health. The purpose of this study was to find out the difference of oral hygiene status and gingival health in children living in an area with high water hardness and low water hardness. This study was performed at 71 students of SDN Kepuh as a high water hardness consumer and 88 students of SDN 2 Kanoman as a low water hardness consumer in Kecamatan Panjatan. Oral hygiene status was assessed using OHI-S measurement while gingival health was assessed using Gingival Index. The score difference of OHI-S and GI between two groups was then analyzed using Mann Whitney test. The result of this study showed a significance difference (p<0,05) of oral hygiene status between children in an area of high water hardness and low water hardness. Oral hygiene status of children in an area of high water hardness was worse compared with children in an area of low water hardness. Meanwhile there was no significance difference (p>0,05) in gingival index between both groups.