PENERIMAAN PENGINTEGRASIAN TIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN OLEH GURU BAHASA INGGRIS SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN GUNUNGKIDUL DENGAN MENERAPKAN MODEL UTAUT

The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in education is a must. Even the design of the curriculum in 2013, noted that ICT becomes a learning tool and must be integrated into all subjects. This is in line with the UNESCO policy since 2004 has been designing and developing an integra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , Kandung Supriyono, , Dr. Sony Warsono, MAFIS., Ak.
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013
Subjects:
ETD
Description
Summary:The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in education is a must. Even the design of the curriculum in 2013, noted that ICT becomes a learning tool and must be integrated into all subjects. This is in line with the UNESCO policy since 2004 has been designing and developing an integrated ICTbased curriculum especially for science, math and language course. This based on the success of the ICT in Schools and SchoolNet Project in ASEAN Setting. It is said that the use of ICT in schools in an integrated way, contributes to the improvement of the quality of learning. This study aims to measure the level of acceptance of the integration of ICT in learning by junior high school English teacher in Gunungkidul. The model used is the simplified of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). The data were collected by questionnaire, and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the help of SmartPLS version 2.0 M3 software. The results indicated that the level of acceptance of English teachers to integrate ICT in learning is at a high level. The factors that affect teachers' intention to integrate ICT in learning is performance expectations, effort expectancy, and social influences. The factors that affect the real integration of ICT is facilitating conditions which explain the variance up to 62.71%. Whereas behavioral intentions is not significant because it is only able to explain the variance of 16.25%.