| Summary: | This research which subjects to understand the notary�s responsibilities as a witness in criminal case in the city of Banjarmasin is specifically to identify the actions of Regional Supervisory Council in the Notary, who is called as a witness in a criminal case, and determine the accountability of the notary as a witness in the trial of criminal cases, in the city of Banjarmasin. This study is using empirical juridical approach from the existing laws ,regarding to notary�s responsibilities as a witness in a criminal case in the city of Banjarmasin. a qualitative analysis is used as the fundamental analysis on the quality and norms of the society. The results show that the notary in charge is supposed to be responsible for issuing certificate properly, including in the qualified certificate and the impacts of it. Notaries are responsible solely for the formal form of an authentic certificate implied by law. Accountability of the notary in criminal case is not regulated in UUJN but notary only regulates sanctions for violations committed by the notary and by the Regional Oversight Council approval first. The copy of such application is given to the notary and the application itself should contain the reason for calling the notary as a witness, suspect or defendant.
|
|---|