| Summary: | This research is aimed at analyzing the Verdict of Sleman District Court
Number 09/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Slmn which rejects the Petition for the Annulment of
the Deed of Donation Number 10/2006, analyzing the compliance of the verdict
with the provision of the Civil Code, and analyzing the validity of the Deed of
Donation Number 10/2006. This research is a juridical-normative research, which
employed secondary data through a library research grounded on primary law
materials, secondary law materials and tertiary law materials. Data were collected
through a documentary method by means of documentary study. The obtained
data were analyzed qualitatively with descriptive method.
The research result indicates the Deed of Donation Number 10/2006 which
had been donated could not be annulled by the donor because it was proven valid
and not legally defective. The court considered the annulment of donation rejected
because the plaintiff failed to prove his arguments from written evidence and
witness evidence which were brought to the trial and connected with provisions in
the Civil Code, namely Article 1666 of the Civil Code, Article 1672 of the Civil
Code and Article 1688 of the Civil Code, that there was no fact that could be used
as the basis of annulling the donation, which had been conducted by the plaintiff
to the defendant. Therefore, the court decided to reject the claim of the plaintiff.
It can be concluded from the research result that the petition of annulment
of the Deed of Donation Number 10/2006 was rejected because according to the
court the requirements of donation annulment in Article 1672 of the Civil Code
and Article 1688 of the Civil Code was not fulfilled and the Plaintiff failed to
prove his arguments, so that the Deed of Donation Number 10/2006 was declared
valid, and the verdict of the rejection on the petition of donation annulment had
complied with the provision in the Civil Code. Therefore, it is suggested that the
donor should know all of the consequences of giving donation. The donor should
be careful in calculating and considering his own property before determining the
property which will be donated so as to avoid disputes in the future.
|
|---|