| Summary: | Region of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD) as one of the former conflict
areas have a wide range of issues at the local level. Moreover, the mass eviction of
anti-GAM society (citizens ethnic Javanese descent) by the middle of the combatants
when conflict raged. The events that lead to widespread soil displaced by abandoned
by their owners. Until in the end, the conflict in the region eased so that the provincial
government has the initiative to restore citizens exodus to North Sumatra. Therefore,
an organization established by Association of Victims in Aceh (HMKKA) as a
medium for the return of the conflict to Aceh area.
Lhokcane is one of the goals of resettlement location formerly was abandoned
by its inhabitants because of the conflict in Aceh. But, the region has now inhabited
by new faces. For the sake of the welfare of their economy, Bener Meriah district
government implements various policies. One of the policies is realized into
sugarcane plantations assistance program.
Introduction of commodity sugarcane is apparently able to create an
interesting social phenomenon among peasants in Lhokcane. It has led to the entry of
commodity competition in access to land and sugarcane assistance program. The
reality of it is about the emergence of inequality both ownership and control over
economic resources. Therefore, this paper aims to understand the process of
acquisition of land and access to assistance programs cane. Henceforth, this study
leads to the removal process of the acquisition of access economic resources that
befalls the farm workers.
To achieve an understanding of the issues, this study used various methods in
data collection and the analysis. The use of ethnographic methods and survey aims to
obtain data that are qualitative and quantitative. The data obtained and analyzed
through analysis of production relationships between actors. The result is gaining
access to land and sugarcane assistance programs tend to be influenced by proprietary
technology, land and social relations. Meanwhile, farm workers actually removed
from the second access economic resources. This is due to local government
regulations as well as the poor outlook attached to the farm workers. The implication,
farm workers take action in response to the exclusion that happened.
|
|---|