MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW
Business actor who wants to conduct Merger, Consolidation, and Acquisition (hereinafter referred as M&A) must consider potential causes such as M&A transaction that may result in monopoly practices and unfair business competition. In order to control and prevent such activities, Indonesian G...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797034861053083648 |
|---|---|
| author | , GUSTI RANIKA SUKMA ISKANDAR PUTRI , Dr. Sulistiowati, S.H., M.Hum, |
| author_facet | , GUSTI RANIKA SUKMA ISKANDAR PUTRI , Dr. Sulistiowati, S.H., M.Hum, |
| author_sort | , GUSTI RANIKA SUKMA ISKANDAR PUTRI |
| collection | UGM |
| description | Business actor who wants to conduct Merger, Consolidation, and Acquisition
(hereinafter referred as M&A) must consider potential causes such as M&A transaction
that may result in monopoly practices and unfair business competition. In order to control
and prevent such activities, Indonesian Government established Law No. 5 Year 1999
(Law) concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business
Competition. The transaction strictly monitored by Commission for the Supervision of
Business Competition / KPPU (Commission). The Indonesian merger control/ filings are
Pre-Evaluation (Consultation) and Post-Evaluation (Notification). The focus of
Indonesian merger control/ merger filings is preventive nature. Hence, the function of
Article 29 of the Law that adopts mandatory Post-Notification becomes questionable.
The method used in this research is a combination of approaches that are normative
and empirical. The writer also compared the Indonesian merger control/merger filings
with United States and Japan. To collect the data, the writer used library and field
research.
The reasons behind the application of Pre-Evaluation (Consultation) phase to
Commission are: to give clear description concerning the impact of M&A transaction,
whether there is an allegation of violation of the Law No. 5 Year 1999 or not |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:18:36Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:127848 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:18:36Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:1278482016-03-04T07:56:37Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/127848/ MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW , GUSTI RANIKA SUKMA ISKANDAR PUTRI , Dr. Sulistiowati, S.H., M.Hum, ETD Business actor who wants to conduct Merger, Consolidation, and Acquisition (hereinafter referred as M&A) must consider potential causes such as M&A transaction that may result in monopoly practices and unfair business competition. In order to control and prevent such activities, Indonesian Government established Law No. 5 Year 1999 (Law) concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The transaction strictly monitored by Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition / KPPU (Commission). The Indonesian merger control/ filings are Pre-Evaluation (Consultation) and Post-Evaluation (Notification). The focus of Indonesian merger control/ merger filings is preventive nature. Hence, the function of Article 29 of the Law that adopts mandatory Post-Notification becomes questionable. The method used in this research is a combination of approaches that are normative and empirical. The writer also compared the Indonesian merger control/merger filings with United States and Japan. To collect the data, the writer used library and field research. The reasons behind the application of Pre-Evaluation (Consultation) phase to Commission are: to give clear description concerning the impact of M&A transaction, whether there is an allegation of violation of the Law No. 5 Year 1999 or not [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , GUSTI RANIKA SUKMA ISKANDAR PUTRI and , Dr. Sulistiowati, S.H., M.Hum, (2014) MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=68153 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , GUSTI RANIKA SUKMA ISKANDAR PUTRI , Dr. Sulistiowati, S.H., M.Hum, MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW |
| title | MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW |
| title_full | MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW |
| title_fullStr | MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW |
| title_full_unstemmed | MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW |
| title_short | MERGER & ACQUISITION FILINGS CONCERNING PRE-EVALUATION AND POST-EVALUATION TO KPPU RELATED TO INDONESIAN ANTIMONOPOLY LAW |
| title_sort | merger acquisition filings concerning pre evaluation and post evaluation to kppu related to indonesian antimonopoly law |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gustiranikasukmaiskandarputri mergeracquisitionfilingsconcerningpreevaluationandpostevaluationtokppurelatedtoindonesianantimonopolylaw AT drsulistiowatishmhum mergeracquisitionfilingsconcerningpreevaluationandpostevaluationtokppurelatedtoindonesianantimonopolylaw |