DESAIN DAN IMPLEMENTASI KENDALI MAGNETIC LEVITATION MENGGUNAKAN METODE SLIDING MODE CONTROL

Magnetic levitation or maglev systems have been widely applied in various fields that are beneficial to humans. Many applications use the maglev system because of its contactless, faster and higher efficiency. In this study, the conventional sliding mode control and global sliding mode control were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , Rudi Uswarman, , Dr. Eng. Adha Imam Cahyadi, S.T., M.Eng.
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014
Subjects:
ETD
Description
Summary:Magnetic levitation or maglev systems have been widely applied in various fields that are beneficial to humans. Many applications use the maglev system because of its contactless, faster and higher efficiency. In this study, the conventional sliding mode control and global sliding mode control were used to control a maglev system. First, a study on a simulation using Matlab Simulink was conducted. Second, implementation research of the actual plant. Sliding mode control was a method that is robust to disturbance and parameter uncertainties. However, the sliding mode control has the chattering phenomenon. In the implementation, if the chattering phenomenon was too-large, the system become unstable due to the limited ability of the electronics component. Sliding mode control will be robust when in sliding mode condition, however not necessarily robust at attaining motion phase. In the global sliding mode control, the attaining motion phase was eliminated so that the whole process of the system response was robust. However, the value of the parameter uncertainty needs to be limited. GSMC methods have better performance than the CSMC methods because GSMC methods have a faster settling time which was 0.1 seconds while the CSMC methods have settling time about 0.2 seconds. Additionally, when the system added disturbance and parameter uncertainties, GSMC has lower the steady-state error which was 0.005 cm while CSMC has a steady state error about 0.06 cm.