PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON
The use of a qualified wood as houses roof truss increasingly scarce and more expensive and the use of reinforced concrete is overdesign then light weight steel is still relatively expensive because it is dominated by a few suppliers. To solve these problems, it is necessary to study the use of alte...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797035018208411648 |
|---|---|
| author | , Adityo Budi Utomo , Prof. Ir. Iman Satyarno, ME, PhD |
| author_facet | , Adityo Budi Utomo , Prof. Ir. Iman Satyarno, ME, PhD |
| author_sort | , Adityo Budi Utomo |
| collection | UGM |
| description | The use of a qualified wood as houses roof truss increasingly scarce and more expensive and the use of reinforced concrete is overdesign then light weight steel is still relatively expensive because it is dominated by a few suppliers. To solve these problems, it is necessary to study the use of alternative materials such as concrete reinforcing steel as the rod element and cast concrete as connection.
The houses roof truss used in this study consists of 3 types made of concrete reinforcing steel, reinforced concrete, and light weight steel.The research of the truss is done with spans of 6 m and a slope of 300, while the loading pattern on the 3-point gording like truss in the community. Loading is done by stacking concrete cylinders were placed in a basket in stages until it reaches the collapse. Focused testing to determine the performance, the pattern of structural failure, and serviceability of each houses roof truss. The concrete reinforcing steel truss don�t have good performance in structure parameters, but the capacity of concrete reinforcing steel truss (1380 Kg) is 188% greater than light weight steel truss and 21% smaller than reinforced concrete truss. Failure structure of reinforcing steel concrete truss due to overcapacity. Concrete reinforcing steel truss can bear the service load if using metal roofing or other roofing lighter, the distance between the truss maximum 2m, and no ceiling. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:22:07Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:128635 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:22:07Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:1286352016-03-04T07:52:55Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/128635/ PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON , Adityo Budi Utomo , Prof. Ir. Iman Satyarno, ME, PhD ETD The use of a qualified wood as houses roof truss increasingly scarce and more expensive and the use of reinforced concrete is overdesign then light weight steel is still relatively expensive because it is dominated by a few suppliers. To solve these problems, it is necessary to study the use of alternative materials such as concrete reinforcing steel as the rod element and cast concrete as connection. The houses roof truss used in this study consists of 3 types made of concrete reinforcing steel, reinforced concrete, and light weight steel.The research of the truss is done with spans of 6 m and a slope of 300, while the loading pattern on the 3-point gording like truss in the community. Loading is done by stacking concrete cylinders were placed in a basket in stages until it reaches the collapse. Focused testing to determine the performance, the pattern of structural failure, and serviceability of each houses roof truss. The concrete reinforcing steel truss don�t have good performance in structure parameters, but the capacity of concrete reinforcing steel truss (1380 Kg) is 188% greater than light weight steel truss and 21% smaller than reinforced concrete truss. Failure structure of reinforcing steel concrete truss due to overcapacity. Concrete reinforcing steel truss can bear the service load if using metal roofing or other roofing lighter, the distance between the truss maximum 2m, and no ceiling. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Adityo Budi Utomo and , Prof. Ir. Iman Satyarno, ME, PhD (2014) PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=68993 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , Adityo Budi Utomo , Prof. Ir. Iman Satyarno, ME, PhD PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON |
| title | PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON |
| title_full | PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON |
| title_fullStr | PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON |
| title_full_unstemmed | PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON |
| title_short | PERILAKU STRUKTUR RANGKA KUDA-KUDA ATAP RUMAH DENGAN BATANG BAJA TULANGAN BETON |
| title_sort | perilaku struktur rangka kuda kuda atap rumah dengan batang baja tulangan beton |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT adityobudiutomo perilakustrukturrangkakudakudaataprumahdenganbatangbajatulanganbeton AT profirimansatyarnomephd perilakustrukturrangkakudakudaataprumahdenganbatangbajatulanganbeton |