KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA

Performance Accountability System for Government Institution (well-known as SAKIP) has been applied for more than a decade but it has not provided optimal function as a management tool and performance measurement system for Indonesian Government Institutions (IGIs). Therefore, study literature based...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , WAHYUDIN, , Prof. Dr. Indra Bastian, MBA, CMA.
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014
Subjects:
ETD
_version_ 1797035099434254336
author , WAHYUDIN
, Prof. Dr. Indra Bastian, MBA, CMA.
author_facet , WAHYUDIN
, Prof. Dr. Indra Bastian, MBA, CMA.
author_sort , WAHYUDIN
collection UGM
description Performance Accountability System for Government Institution (well-known as SAKIP) has been applied for more than a decade but it has not provided optimal function as a management tool and performance measurement system for Indonesian Government Institutions (IGIs). Therefore, study literature based research was intended to analyze and discuss the construction of SAKIP. This study presented the development of SAKIP construction, described the development of SAKIP performance measurement models, evaluated SAKIP construction, and analyzed the implementation of SAKIP performance measurement models. The method which is used is qualitative content analysis approach to the object of study in the form of modules and regulations about SAKIP. The themes in content analysis include: planning, measurement, and performance reporting which are the major components of SAKIP. More specifically, the simulation approach is also used to analyze the work of SAKIP performance measurement models. Simulation object covers the Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture and its Echelon Unit underneath. The analysis results showed that the SAKIP performance measurement models were done at that point in time (on periodic basis), not on cycle (ongoing basis). The work of old SAKIP performance measurement model was too complex, unrealistic, and unsystematic because of problems in performance scoring and tiered weighting techniques. Although the weighting for the achievements� score or performance indicators have been removed, the work of new SAKIP performance measurement model was substantially same as the old system for comparing performance data. It�s done on a limited basis. Evaluation results showed that SAKIP construction has a major weakness in the planning and measurement components. They did not develop good and comprehensive performance indicators. Meanwhile, implementation of measurement technology has not touched the value for money (3 E�s measurement) explicitly. With these notices, implications for the government practitioners to fix the weakness of SAKIP construction is sharpening performance indicator information mainly on outputs and outcomes so as not to cause confusion in the adoption phase of performance measures. In addition, it is also necessary improvements to measurement technology conceptually.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T23:23:22Z
format Thesis
id oai:generic.eprints.org:129041
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
last_indexed 2024-03-13T23:23:22Z
publishDate 2014
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:1290412016-03-04T08:16:58Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/129041/ KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA , WAHYUDIN , Prof. Dr. Indra Bastian, MBA, CMA. ETD Performance Accountability System for Government Institution (well-known as SAKIP) has been applied for more than a decade but it has not provided optimal function as a management tool and performance measurement system for Indonesian Government Institutions (IGIs). Therefore, study literature based research was intended to analyze and discuss the construction of SAKIP. This study presented the development of SAKIP construction, described the development of SAKIP performance measurement models, evaluated SAKIP construction, and analyzed the implementation of SAKIP performance measurement models. The method which is used is qualitative content analysis approach to the object of study in the form of modules and regulations about SAKIP. The themes in content analysis include: planning, measurement, and performance reporting which are the major components of SAKIP. More specifically, the simulation approach is also used to analyze the work of SAKIP performance measurement models. Simulation object covers the Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture and its Echelon Unit underneath. The analysis results showed that the SAKIP performance measurement models were done at that point in time (on periodic basis), not on cycle (ongoing basis). The work of old SAKIP performance measurement model was too complex, unrealistic, and unsystematic because of problems in performance scoring and tiered weighting techniques. Although the weighting for the achievements� score or performance indicators have been removed, the work of new SAKIP performance measurement model was substantially same as the old system for comparing performance data. It�s done on a limited basis. Evaluation results showed that SAKIP construction has a major weakness in the planning and measurement components. They did not develop good and comprehensive performance indicators. Meanwhile, implementation of measurement technology has not touched the value for money (3 E�s measurement) explicitly. With these notices, implications for the government practitioners to fix the weakness of SAKIP construction is sharpening performance indicator information mainly on outputs and outcomes so as not to cause confusion in the adoption phase of performance measures. In addition, it is also necessary improvements to measurement technology conceptually. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , WAHYUDIN and , Prof. Dr. Indra Bastian, MBA, CMA. (2014) KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=69416
spellingShingle ETD
, WAHYUDIN
, Prof. Dr. Indra Bastian, MBA, CMA.
KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA
title KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA
title_full KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA
title_fullStr KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA
title_full_unstemmed KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA
title_short KAJIAN KRITIS SISTEM AKUNTABILITAS KINERJA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH (SAKIP) SEBAGAI ALAT MANAJEMEN KINERJA: SUATU TINJAUAN PADA INSTANSI PEMERINTAH INDONESIA
title_sort kajian kritis sistem akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah sakip sebagai alat manajemen kinerja suatu tinjauan pada instansi pemerintah indonesia
topic ETD
work_keys_str_mv AT wahyudin kajiankritissistemakuntabilitaskinerjainstansipemerintahsakipsebagaialatmanajemenkinerjasuatutinjauanpadainstansipemerintahindonesia
AT profdrindrabastianmbacma kajiankritissistemakuntabilitaskinerjainstansipemerintahsakipsebagaialatmanajemenkinerjasuatutinjauanpadainstansipemerintahindonesia