PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT ( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST)
This study aims to examine legal protection for recipients of fiduciary warranty if the objects put up as collateral are not sold within the time period specified in the Act No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. This research on laws is normative-empirical in nat...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1826048353807368192 |
|---|---|
| author | , SINTHA CAHYANINGTYAS , Ninik Darmini, S.H., M.H. |
| author_facet | , SINTHA CAHYANINGTYAS , Ninik Darmini, S.H., M.H. |
| author_sort | , SINTHA CAHYANINGTYAS |
| collection | UGM |
| description | This study aims to examine legal protection for recipients of fiduciary
warranty if the objects put up as collateral are not sold within the time period
specified in the Act No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt
Payment Obligations.
This research on laws is normative-empirical in nature. Normative
approaches were employed to analyze different laws and regulations on bank
credit agreements, laws on fiduciary warranty and bankruptcy. Empirical
approaches were used to analyze laws seen as patterned behavior of the society in
public life where interactions always occur and which relates to the social
aspects. Respondents of this study were 3 (three) staffs of PT. Bank Mandiri Tbk
while the informant of this study was 1 (one) curator in bankruptcy.
In accordance with the research findings, PT. TAPUNION WIDYA BOX
INDUSTRIES did not manage to sell assets within the period of time specified in
Paragraph 59 of the Act No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt
Payment Obligations and therefore the assets of the debtors that were initially in
the possession of the creditor were then transferred to curators for sale. Sales of
assets by the creditor resulted in several bankruptcy costs causing some prejudice
to the rights of the creditor although debt repayment by the debtors still
occurred. It has been mentioned above that the authorized party to execute
collateral can be carried out either by secured creditors or curators in charge of the
bankruptcy case. It will depend on the relationship of assets with the creditor
(whether the assets are used as collateral or not) and on the time when the
execution will be carried out, while the strict regulation on the practice of the
calculation of time period restrictions applied to the exercise of the creditor�s right
to execute is not specified in the existing laws and regulations. In so doing, the
position of creditors receiving fiduciary warranty as secured creditors is
unprotected.
Keywords: Credit Agreement, Fiduciary Warranty, Bankruptcy. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:27:45Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:130092 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:27:45Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:1300922016-03-04T08:12:42Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/130092/ PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT ( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) , SINTHA CAHYANINGTYAS , Ninik Darmini, S.H., M.H. ETD This study aims to examine legal protection for recipients of fiduciary warranty if the objects put up as collateral are not sold within the time period specified in the Act No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. This research on laws is normative-empirical in nature. Normative approaches were employed to analyze different laws and regulations on bank credit agreements, laws on fiduciary warranty and bankruptcy. Empirical approaches were used to analyze laws seen as patterned behavior of the society in public life where interactions always occur and which relates to the social aspects. Respondents of this study were 3 (three) staffs of PT. Bank Mandiri Tbk while the informant of this study was 1 (one) curator in bankruptcy. In accordance with the research findings, PT. TAPUNION WIDYA BOX INDUSTRIES did not manage to sell assets within the period of time specified in Paragraph 59 of the Act No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and therefore the assets of the debtors that were initially in the possession of the creditor were then transferred to curators for sale. Sales of assets by the creditor resulted in several bankruptcy costs causing some prejudice to the rights of the creditor although debt repayment by the debtors still occurred. It has been mentioned above that the authorized party to execute collateral can be carried out either by secured creditors or curators in charge of the bankruptcy case. It will depend on the relationship of assets with the creditor (whether the assets are used as collateral or not) and on the time when the execution will be carried out, while the strict regulation on the practice of the calculation of time period restrictions applied to the exercise of the creditor�s right to execute is not specified in the existing laws and regulations. In so doing, the position of creditors receiving fiduciary warranty as secured creditors is unprotected. Keywords: Credit Agreement, Fiduciary Warranty, Bankruptcy. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , SINTHA CAHYANINGTYAS and , Ninik Darmini, S.H., M.H. (2014) PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT ( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST). UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=70504 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , SINTHA CAHYANINGTYAS , Ninik Darmini, S.H., M.H. PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT ( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) |
| title | PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT
( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) |
| title_full | PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT
( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) |
| title_fullStr | PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT
( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) |
| title_full_unstemmed | PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT
( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) |
| title_short | PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR PEMBERI JAMINAN FIDUSIA PAILIT
( Studi Kasus Pada Penetapan Pailit Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor: 37/Pailit/2011/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST) |
| title_sort | perlindungan hukum bagi kreditur dalam hal debitur pemberi jaminan fidusia pailit studi kasus pada penetapan pailit pengadilan niaga jakarta pusat nomor 37 pailit 2011 pn niaga jkt pst |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sinthacahyaningtyas perlindunganhukumbagikrediturdalamhaldebiturpemberijaminanfidusiapailitstudikasuspadapenetapanpailitpengadilanniagajakartapusatnomor37pailit2011pnniagajktpst AT ninikdarminishmh perlindunganhukumbagikrediturdalamhaldebiturpemberijaminanfidusiapailitstudikasuspadapenetapanpailitpengadilanniagajakartapusatnomor37pailit2011pnniagajktpst |