STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is a three-dimensional shape of the Earth's surface represented in a model. One of some methods used to build DEM is interpolation. Each interpolation method brings their own consequences, such as Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) constructed of irregular flat t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , SIGIT NUR IMAN W., , Bowo Susilo, S.Si., MT.
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014
Subjects:
ETD
_version_ 1797035408901537792
author , SIGIT NUR IMAN W.
, Bowo Susilo, S.Si., MT.
author_facet , SIGIT NUR IMAN W.
, Bowo Susilo, S.Si., MT.
author_sort , SIGIT NUR IMAN W.
collection UGM
description Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is a three-dimensional shape of the Earth's surface represented in a model. One of some methods used to build DEM is interpolation. Each interpolation method brings their own consequences, such as Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) constructed of irregular flat triangles which theoretically can not represent curvature. On the other hand, there is spherical equation which is theoretically able to cover this shortfall. The study includes a ground surveying using Total Station as the data. The sample is Dome Karst (100 m in diameter) which represents a curved shape and a soccer field that represents a flat shape. Data such as altitude point (x,y,z), they are 60 for Dome Karst and 6 for soccer field . While the test point of accuracy each method are 16 for Dome Karst and 3 for the football field. The data is interpolated by TIN method and spherical equation, then it is calculated as the volume of Dome Karst. DEM formed twice for each of the interpolation method. The results shows that the TIN interpolation can not properly represent the Dome Karst (RMS-Error: 2.368974813), while spherical equation can represent Dome Karst properly (RMS-Error: 2.133816668). Instead , TIN interpolation can represent well the football field (RMS-Error : 0.192333044), while the spherical equation can not represent well the football field (RMS-Error: 2.643165148). There are changes in the accuracy of each interpolation method when the sample points are reducted. With 38 sample points, obtained 4.03952163 of standar deviation of linear interpolation and 3.525802603 of standar deviation of spherical equation interpolation. Dome Karst volume generated from TIN interpolation is 1047,058 m3, while the volume of Dome Karst generated from spherical equation interpolation is 730,8512 m3.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T23:29:45Z
format Thesis
id oai:generic.eprints.org:130577
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
last_indexed 2024-03-13T23:29:45Z
publishDate 2014
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:1305772016-03-04T08:12:37Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/130577/ STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK , SIGIT NUR IMAN W. , Bowo Susilo, S.Si., MT. ETD Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is a three-dimensional shape of the Earth's surface represented in a model. One of some methods used to build DEM is interpolation. Each interpolation method brings their own consequences, such as Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) constructed of irregular flat triangles which theoretically can not represent curvature. On the other hand, there is spherical equation which is theoretically able to cover this shortfall. The study includes a ground surveying using Total Station as the data. The sample is Dome Karst (100 m in diameter) which represents a curved shape and a soccer field that represents a flat shape. Data such as altitude point (x,y,z), they are 60 for Dome Karst and 6 for soccer field . While the test point of accuracy each method are 16 for Dome Karst and 3 for the football field. The data is interpolated by TIN method and spherical equation, then it is calculated as the volume of Dome Karst. DEM formed twice for each of the interpolation method. The results shows that the TIN interpolation can not properly represent the Dome Karst (RMS-Error: 2.368974813), while spherical equation can represent Dome Karst properly (RMS-Error: 2.133816668). Instead , TIN interpolation can represent well the football field (RMS-Error : 0.192333044), while the spherical equation can not represent well the football field (RMS-Error: 2.643165148). There are changes in the accuracy of each interpolation method when the sample points are reducted. With 38 sample points, obtained 4.03952163 of standar deviation of linear interpolation and 3.525802603 of standar deviation of spherical equation interpolation. Dome Karst volume generated from TIN interpolation is 1047,058 m3, while the volume of Dome Karst generated from spherical equation interpolation is 730,8512 m3. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , SIGIT NUR IMAN W. and , Bowo Susilo, S.Si., MT. (2014) STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=71002
spellingShingle ETD
, SIGIT NUR IMAN W.
, Bowo Susilo, S.Si., MT.
STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK
title STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK
title_full STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK
title_fullStr STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK
title_full_unstemmed STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK
title_short STUDI KOMPARASI METODE INTERPOLASI LINIER DAN INTERPOLASI PERSAMAAN BOLA DALAM PERHITUNGAN VOLUMETRIK
title_sort studi komparasi metode interpolasi linier dan interpolasi persamaan bola dalam perhitungan volumetrik
topic ETD
work_keys_str_mv AT sigitnurimanw studikomparasimetodeinterpolasilinierdaninterpolasipersamaanboladalamperhitunganvolumetrik
AT bowosusilossimt studikomparasimetodeinterpolasilinierdaninterpolasipersamaanboladalamperhitunganvolumetrik