TERHADAP SARANA DAN PRASARANA HUNIAN TETAP PAGERJURANG, KABUPATEN SLEMAN

The study aims at revealing community�s acceptances on permanent shelter infrastructures. The investigated infrastructures comprise a mosque, workshops, village public halls, a multipurpose building, a group stable, an integrated waste disposal place, and an electrical distribution network. The se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , GARDYAS BIDARI A, , Prof. Ir. Sudaryono, M.Eng., Ph.D.
Format: Thesis
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014
Subjects:
ETD
Description
Summary:The study aims at revealing community�s acceptances on permanent shelter infrastructures. The investigated infrastructures comprise a mosque, workshops, village public halls, a multipurpose building, a group stable, an integrated waste disposal place, and an electrical distribution network. The selected research site is Pagerjurang Permanent Shelter in Kepuharjo, Cangkringan, Sleman. It is chosen purposively since the site is considered containing information-rich cases for study in-depth This study uses inductive-qualitative research method. The data collection was carried out by field observations, in-depth interviews, and document analyses. The main informants are people who know the development process of the infrastructures and the main users of each infrastructure selected proportionally from three shelter blocks. The research findings show that there are dualism on the acceptance of infrastructures in Pagerjurang Permanent Shelter. Some community members make use of the infrastructures and some others do not. Good physical conditions of the infrastructures, the infrastructures that is built in their own shelter block, and the adequacy of the infrastructures are the reasons why some members of the community willingly make use of the infrastructures. On the contrary, the other ones deny use the infrastructures because the location of the infrastructures is considered quite far from their block, they do not know the presence of some infrastructures, the infrastructure ownership is obscure, and they are disappointed in the site plan changes.