| Summary: | This study aims at analyzing the responsilibity of limited company in the
civil suit of land indemnity, so the juridical relevance between the responsibility
og limeted company and Article 1364 of Burgerlijk wetbook can be determined,
and at analyzing tge legal impact on the limeted company as a legal subject in the
civil suit of land indemnity with a case study of the Verdict of court Number :
12/Pdt.G/2009/PN.K.Kp.
The study was conducted using aa normative juridical method by studying
the responsibility of limited company in the civil suit of land indemnity and its
legal impact with a case study of the Verdict of Court Number :
12/Pdt.G/2009/PN.K.Kp.
The results of the study show the there was no civil responsibility of the
limeted company on the civil suit of land indemnity. In the verdict of civil suit ,
the company rejected the whole suit and it means that the legal act was not
evidenced. Therefore, there was no obligation for the company to give the land
indemnity. In view of its legal impact on the company as the legal subject in the
civil suit of land indemnity with a case study of the Verdict if court number :
12/Pdt.G/2009/PN.K.Kp, based on the verdict of court, it is evidenced that the
company did not conduct an act against the law, so as the legal subject it had the
right over the land as well as plans growing over it is before the suit was
proposed. The authority of management in the company was enforced by the
Director and it is evidenced that the Director did not conduct any mistake or
derelictions. The Commnissary also performed inspection function in accordance
with the provisions of the statutes of the limited company.
|
|---|