TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA
This study was to know, understand and analyze factors making notary personnel necessary to attend in criminal case session and describe legal effects on notary personnel in relation to the deed he made. This study was conducted by juridical-empirical approach, namely a study with problems solved by...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797036145682415616 |
|---|---|
| author | , Kurniawan Prayitno , Sigid Riyanto, SH., M.Si. |
| author_facet | , Kurniawan Prayitno , Sigid Riyanto, SH., M.Si. |
| author_sort | , Kurniawan Prayitno |
| collection | UGM |
| description | This study was to know, understand and analyze factors making notary personnel necessary to attend in criminal case session and describe legal effects on notary personnel in relation to the deed he made.
This study was conducted by juridical-empirical approach, namely a study with problems solved by reviewing valid regulation in Indonesia and the writer also came to the field to collect and examine data and facts obtained in the field. The data consisted of primary and secondary data. Primary data were collected directly from first source, namely behavior of local people in this study. Secondary data consisted of formal documents, books, and results of study such as report, diary, etc.
The results of study indicate that the authentic deed containing false information, in this case, only having evidence force as underhand deed. The agreement written in the land sales deed is void in law. It means that the land sales agreement is void since it was made or it is never found present. In other words, since the deed was made early, it has no legal forces for parties. In order to evidence the indication of criminal action of the authentic deed, it is necessary to ask notary personnel to attend in examination of criminal case in which it is duty for each citizen/member of community to attend in examination of criminal case as witness, specialist witness or translator complying with Article 224 of Criminal Code, it is also true for Notary personnel as Public Official where his attendance must get permission previously from Local Honorary Committee. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:41:33Z |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:134124 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:41:33Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:1341242016-03-04T07:58:09Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/134124/ TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA , Kurniawan Prayitno , Sigid Riyanto, SH., M.Si. ETD This study was to know, understand and analyze factors making notary personnel necessary to attend in criminal case session and describe legal effects on notary personnel in relation to the deed he made. This study was conducted by juridical-empirical approach, namely a study with problems solved by reviewing valid regulation in Indonesia and the writer also came to the field to collect and examine data and facts obtained in the field. The data consisted of primary and secondary data. Primary data were collected directly from first source, namely behavior of local people in this study. Secondary data consisted of formal documents, books, and results of study such as report, diary, etc. The results of study indicate that the authentic deed containing false information, in this case, only having evidence force as underhand deed. The agreement written in the land sales deed is void in law. It means that the land sales agreement is void since it was made or it is never found present. In other words, since the deed was made early, it has no legal forces for parties. In order to evidence the indication of criminal action of the authentic deed, it is necessary to ask notary personnel to attend in examination of criminal case in which it is duty for each citizen/member of community to attend in examination of criminal case as witness, specialist witness or translator complying with Article 224 of Criminal Code, it is also true for Notary personnel as Public Official where his attendance must get permission previously from Local Honorary Committee. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Kurniawan Prayitno and , Sigid Riyanto, SH., M.Si. (2014) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=75125 |
| spellingShingle | ETD , Kurniawan Prayitno , Sigid Riyanto, SH., M.Si. TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA |
| title | TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA |
| title_full | TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA |
| title_fullStr | TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA |
| title_full_unstemmed | TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA |
| title_short | TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP AKTA NOTARIS YANG MENGANDUNG UNSUR PERBUATAN PIDANA |
| title_sort | tinjauan yuridis terhadap akta notaris yang mengandung unsur perbuatan pidana |
| topic | ETD |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kurniawanprayitno tinjauanyuridisterhadapaktanotarisyangmengandungunsurperbuatanpidana AT sigidriyantoshmsi tinjauanyuridisterhadapaktanotarisyangmengandungunsurperbuatanpidana |