| סיכום: | This study aims to explain why the Prophet Muhammad comply to The
Hudaybiya Treaty although in its articles are considered harmful. By
answering the question above, it is expected to build a model of compliance to
international agreement in the Islamic perspective. Christian Reus-Smit's
intertistial conception of politics considered appropriate in this study because
it provides space for the role of ideas such as identity and norm in explaining a
political action. This study found Prophet Muhammad comply to Treaty of
Hudaibiyah because of political deliberation wich integrate four type or
reason: idiographic, purposive, ethical, and instrumental. Ideographic
deliberation determine the formulation of interest (purposive deliberation).
The formulation of these interests will determine the action (instrumental
deliberation) in accordance with the available resources and external constrain
faced, as well as appropriate with or not contrary to Islamic norms and
universally applicable norms (ethical deliberation). Ideographicly, based on
identities: as believers who should obey Allah and His Messenger, as a noble
people who hold the promise. Purposively, the mission of Muslims is to
preach the religion of monotheism to all mankind, therefore the condition of
peace and religious freedom must be realized. Ethically, the question of how
should we act is answered by everything done must in concordance with
Islamic rules and customary law norms which emphasize the obligation to
comply with the concluded agreements. Instrumentally, the chosen action
wich in line with the formulated interest and in accordance with the norms of
Islam is comply to the peace treaty.
|
|---|