Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council

Islamic banking and finance is identified as one of the areas that may contribute to economic transformation for Malaysia. Malaysia is targeted to be the hub for Islamic banking services and education. The country has to keep up with a fast developing Islamic banking sector by providing adequate reg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shuaib, Farid Sufian
Format: Proceeding Paper
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/17040/2/RelinquishingJudicialPowersToJuristsInIslamicBanking_Farid.pdf
_version_ 1796876366028734464
author Shuaib, Farid Sufian
author_facet Shuaib, Farid Sufian
author_sort Shuaib, Farid Sufian
collection IIUM
description Islamic banking and finance is identified as one of the areas that may contribute to economic transformation for Malaysia. Malaysia is targeted to be the hub for Islamic banking services and education. The country has to keep up with a fast developing Islamic banking sector by providing adequate regulatory framework. One of the elements in this framework is dispute resolution mechanism. A peculiar policy adopted by the government in regulating Islamic banking is by requiring the courts to refer to an advisory committee to make a final decision on disputes regarding Islamic banking and finance. This is peculiar since the courts are usually the final arbiter of disputes including matters involving banking and finance. This policy is evidenced in the new Act of the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009 replacing the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 1958. The new Act requires the courts to refer to the Shariah Advisory Council on matters of Islamic banking and the decision of the Council is binding on the courts. Eight out of eleven members of the Council are Islamic banking scholars and jurists. This paper seeks to explore the possible reasons for such divergent route adopted by the new Act and to consider advantages and disadvantages by relegating the final arbiter of disputes to jurists rather than judges.
first_indexed 2024-03-05T22:51:26Z
format Proceeding Paper
id oai:generic.eprints.org:17040
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-05T22:51:26Z
publishDate 2011
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:170402012-02-09T03:21:18Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/17040/ Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council Shuaib, Farid Sufian K Law (General) KBP469 Influence of other legal systems on Islamic law KBP480 Conflict of laws Islamic banking and finance is identified as one of the areas that may contribute to economic transformation for Malaysia. Malaysia is targeted to be the hub for Islamic banking services and education. The country has to keep up with a fast developing Islamic banking sector by providing adequate regulatory framework. One of the elements in this framework is dispute resolution mechanism. A peculiar policy adopted by the government in regulating Islamic banking is by requiring the courts to refer to an advisory committee to make a final decision on disputes regarding Islamic banking and finance. This is peculiar since the courts are usually the final arbiter of disputes including matters involving banking and finance. This policy is evidenced in the new Act of the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009 replacing the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 1958. The new Act requires the courts to refer to the Shariah Advisory Council on matters of Islamic banking and the decision of the Council is binding on the courts. Eight out of eleven members of the Council are Islamic banking scholars and jurists. This paper seeks to explore the possible reasons for such divergent route adopted by the new Act and to consider advantages and disadvantages by relegating the final arbiter of disputes to jurists rather than judges. 2011 Proceeding Paper NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/17040/2/RelinquishingJudicialPowersToJuristsInIslamicBanking_Farid.pdf Shuaib, Farid Sufian (2011) Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council. In: 2nd International Conference on Public Policy & Social Sciences 2011: Socio-Economic Transformation Issues and Challenges in the 21st Century, 31 October - 1 November 2011, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. (Unpublished)
spellingShingle K Law (General)
KBP469 Influence of other legal systems on Islamic law
KBP480 Conflict of laws
Shuaib, Farid Sufian
Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council
title Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council
title_full Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council
title_fullStr Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council
title_short Exploring the Policy of relinquishing Judicial Powers to the Jurists in Determining Islamic Banking Disputes: The Case of Bank Negara's Shariah Advisory Council
title_sort exploring the policy of relinquishing judicial powers to the jurists in determining islamic banking disputes the case of bank negara s shariah advisory council
topic K Law (General)
KBP469 Influence of other legal systems on Islamic law
KBP480 Conflict of laws
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/17040/2/RelinquishingJudicialPowersToJuristsInIslamicBanking_Farid.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shuaibfaridsufian exploringthepolicyofrelinquishingjudicialpowerstothejuristsindeterminingislamicbankingdisputesthecaseofbanknegarasshariahadvisorycouncil