Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan.

The objective of this research is to compare the mechanical properties and crack growth rates between Al 2024-T3 and Al 2524-T after being chemically milled and shotpeened processes. First of all, one side of the aluminum surface was chemically milled using NaOH + Na2S +H20 etchant. The surface was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
Format: Article
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2005
Subjects:
_version_ 1797018783308578816
author Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
author_facet Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
author_sort Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
collection UGM
description The objective of this research is to compare the mechanical properties and crack growth rates between Al 2024-T3 and Al 2524-T after being chemically milled and shotpeened processes. First of all, one side of the aluminum surface was chemically milled using NaOH + Na2S +H20 etchant. The surface was then shotpeened with 0, 03A, 0, 05A and 0, 07A peening intensity. The product of chemical milling and shotpeening was tested its hardness, roughness, tensile and crack growth rates. The crack growth test was carried out using a servo hydraulic MTS 810 testing machine under stress level 20% and R= 0,3. The extension of crack length was monitored using two travelling microscopes. Experimental result shows that the fatigue life of chemical milling product decreases about 32% and 22% compared to that of raw materials for Al 2524-T3 and Al 2024-T3, respectively. On the other hand, the fatigue life of shotpeening product increase varying from 85% to 105% compared to that of raw materials. In general, The chemical milling product of Al 2024-T3 has better fatigue life compared to that of Al 2524-T3. In contrast, The shotpeening product of Al 2524-T3 has better fatigue life compared to that of Al 2024-T3. Keywords : chemical milling, shotpeening, crack growth rate
first_indexed 2024-03-05T23:03:22Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:23076
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
last_indexed 2024-03-13T18:49:37Z
publishDate 2005
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:230762014-06-18T00:27:17Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/23076/ Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan. Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib Jurnal i-lib UGM The objective of this research is to compare the mechanical properties and crack growth rates between Al 2024-T3 and Al 2524-T after being chemically milled and shotpeened processes. First of all, one side of the aluminum surface was chemically milled using NaOH + Na2S +H20 etchant. The surface was then shotpeened with 0, 03A, 0, 05A and 0, 07A peening intensity. The product of chemical milling and shotpeening was tested its hardness, roughness, tensile and crack growth rates. The crack growth test was carried out using a servo hydraulic MTS 810 testing machine under stress level 20% and R= 0,3. The extension of crack length was monitored using two travelling microscopes. Experimental result shows that the fatigue life of chemical milling product decreases about 32% and 22% compared to that of raw materials for Al 2524-T3 and Al 2024-T3, respectively. On the other hand, the fatigue life of shotpeening product increase varying from 85% to 105% compared to that of raw materials. In general, The chemical milling product of Al 2024-T3 has better fatigue life compared to that of Al 2524-T3. In contrast, The shotpeening product of Al 2524-T3 has better fatigue life compared to that of Al 2024-T3. Keywords : chemical milling, shotpeening, crack growth rate [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2005 Article NonPeerReviewed Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib (2005) Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan. Jurnal i-lib UGM. http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=6009
spellingShingle Jurnal i-lib UGM
Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan.
title Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan.
title_full Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan.
title_fullStr Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan.
title_full_unstemmed Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan.
title_short Perbandingan Laju Perambatan Retak AL 2024-T3 dan AL 2524-T3 Setelah Mengalami Perlakuan Permukaan.
title_sort perbandingan laju perambatan retak al 2024 t3 dan al 2524 t3 setelah mengalami perlakuan permukaan
topic Jurnal i-lib UGM
work_keys_str_mv AT perpustakaanugmilib perbandinganlajuperambatanretakal2024t3danal2524t3setelahmengalamiperlakuanpermukaan