Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as Binder

The research was conducted to determine the physical and organoleptic quality of pellets using different tubers (taro, potato, and sweet potato) as binder. Pellets were produced using double crane small flat die pelletizer and without instrument of conditioning. Pellet ingredients consisted of corn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Astuti, Andriyani, Hanim, Chusnul, Akil, Hanivan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, ISSTAP 2017 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/274470/1/Astuti%20%28ISTAP%202017%29.pdf
Description
Summary:The research was conducted to determine the physical and organoleptic quality of pellets using different tubers (taro, potato, and sweet potato) as binder. Pellets were produced using double crane small flat die pelletizer and without instrument of conditioning. Pellet ingredients consisted of corn (16.89-17.38%), soy bean meal (9.47-10.08%), copra meal (5.63-5.79%), cassava leaves meal (45.86-45.90%), molasses (2.75%), limestone (3.00%), and salt (0.75%). The pellet ingredients and binders were formulated to produce three type of pellets with the same crude protein and energy level. Samples of pellets were tested for their hardness, Pellet Durability Index (PDI), texture, color, and odor. Pellets using taro binder was higher (95.57%) on PDI than potato (94.87%) and sweet potato (94.67%). Texture, color, and odor of pellets showed no difference between treatments. It could be concluded that organoleptic qualities of pellets were similar, while taro showed best physical quality for pellet binder.