Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as Binder
The research was conducted to determine the physical and organoleptic quality of pellets using different tubers (taro, potato, and sweet potato) as binder. Pellets were produced using double crane small flat die pelletizer and without instrument of conditioning. Pellet ingredients consisted of corn...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, ISSTAP 2017
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/274470/1/Astuti%20%28ISTAP%202017%29.pdf |
_version_ | 1797036857221971968 |
---|---|
author | Astuti, Andriyani Hanim, Chusnul Akil, Hanivan |
author_facet | Astuti, Andriyani Hanim, Chusnul Akil, Hanivan |
author_sort | Astuti, Andriyani |
collection | UGM |
description | The research was conducted to determine the physical and organoleptic quality of pellets using different tubers (taro, potato, and sweet potato) as binder. Pellets were produced using double crane small flat die pelletizer and without instrument of conditioning. Pellet ingredients consisted of corn (16.89-17.38%), soy bean meal (9.47-10.08%), copra meal (5.63-5.79%), cassava leaves meal (45.86-45.90%), molasses (2.75%), limestone (3.00%), and salt (0.75%). The pellet ingredients and binders were formulated to produce three type of pellets with the same crude protein and energy level. Samples of pellets were tested for their hardness, Pellet Durability Index
(PDI), texture, color, and odor. Pellets using taro binder was higher (95.57%) on PDI than potato
(94.87%) and sweet potato (94.67%). Texture, color, and odor of pellets showed no difference between treatments. It could be concluded that organoleptic qualities of pellets were similar, while taro showed best physical quality for pellet binder. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:53:30Z |
format | Article |
id | oai:generic.eprints.org:274470 |
institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T23:53:30Z |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, ISSTAP 2017 |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:2744702018-05-28T00:38:13Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/274470/ Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as Binder Astuti, Andriyani Hanim, Chusnul Akil, Hanivan Animal Production The research was conducted to determine the physical and organoleptic quality of pellets using different tubers (taro, potato, and sweet potato) as binder. Pellets were produced using double crane small flat die pelletizer and without instrument of conditioning. Pellet ingredients consisted of corn (16.89-17.38%), soy bean meal (9.47-10.08%), copra meal (5.63-5.79%), cassava leaves meal (45.86-45.90%), molasses (2.75%), limestone (3.00%), and salt (0.75%). The pellet ingredients and binders were formulated to produce three type of pellets with the same crude protein and energy level. Samples of pellets were tested for their hardness, Pellet Durability Index (PDI), texture, color, and odor. Pellets using taro binder was higher (95.57%) on PDI than potato (94.87%) and sweet potato (94.67%). Texture, color, and odor of pellets showed no difference between treatments. It could be concluded that organoleptic qualities of pellets were similar, while taro showed best physical quality for pellet binder. Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, ISSTAP 2017 2017-09-14 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repository.ugm.ac.id/274470/1/Astuti%20%28ISTAP%202017%29.pdf Astuti, Andriyani and Hanim, Chusnul and Akil, Hanivan (2017) Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as Binder. The 7th International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production. pp. 209-215. ISSN 978-979-1215-29-9 |
spellingShingle | Animal Production Astuti, Andriyani Hanim, Chusnul Akil, Hanivan Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as Binder |
title | Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as
Binder |
title_full | Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as
Binder |
title_fullStr | Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as
Binder |
title_full_unstemmed | Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as
Binder |
title_short | Physical and Organoleptic Quality of Pellet with Different Tubers Type as
Binder |
title_sort | physical and organoleptic quality of pellet with different tubers type as binder |
topic | Animal Production |
url | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/274470/1/Astuti%20%28ISTAP%202017%29.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT astutiandriyani physicalandorganolepticqualityofpelletwithdifferenttuberstypeasbinder AT hanimchusnul physicalandorganolepticqualityofpelletwithdifferenttuberstypeasbinder AT akilhanivan physicalandorganolepticqualityofpelletwithdifferenttuberstypeasbinder |