| Summary: | The aim of this research is to analyze behavior of Supreme Court's judge on detention
period sentence for illegal logging defendants in Indonesiafrom year 2002 through 2008.
Thefirst analysis is censored normal regression method using detention period indictment
by prosecutor, detention period sentence by district court, defendant's gender, appeal
effort, defendant's age, and defendant's job variables. Those variables are used to analyze
how each variable affect on Supreme Court's verdict on detention period sentence for
illegal logging defendants in Indonesia. Second analysis is descriptive statistic involves
three levels of jurisdiction's considerations (prosec1:ltor,district court, and Supreme
Court) on determining detention period sentence for illegal logging defendants in
Indonesia and suitability those three levels of jurisdiction to law. Research's result shows
that detention period indictment by prosecutor, detention period sentence by district court,
and defendant's age significantly affect on Supreme Court's verdict on detention period
sentence for illegal logging defendants in Indonesia. But, on the other hand there is
unsuitable verdict made by those three levels ofjurisdiction to law.
Keywords: court's verdict, illegal logging, censored normal regression
|
|---|