Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap?

Across Asia and the Pacific, legal pluralist systems meet both cultural norms and address injustices at the local level. What is the capacity of these pluralist systems to provide justice and mitigate discrimination against women? This article examines women’s experiences across five countries to id...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mollica, Caitlin, Davies, Sara E., True, Jacqui, Eddyono, Sri Wiyanti, Fonseka, Bhavani, Johnston, Melissa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Johns Hopkins University Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282988/1/WomenandJusticeDivide2022.pdf
_version_ 1826050567341867008
author Mollica, Caitlin
Davies, Sara E.
True, Jacqui
Eddyono, Sri Wiyanti
Fonseka, Bhavani
Johnston, Melissa
author_facet Mollica, Caitlin
Davies, Sara E.
True, Jacqui
Eddyono, Sri Wiyanti
Fonseka, Bhavani
Johnston, Melissa
author_sort Mollica, Caitlin
collection UGM
description Across Asia and the Pacific, legal pluralist systems meet both cultural norms and address injustices at the local level. What is the capacity of these pluralist systems to provide justice and mitigate discrimination against women? This article examines women’s experiences across five countries to identify the factors that enable and constrain women’s engagement with legal pluralist justice systems in the Asia-Pacific region. Drawing on examples of women’s individual and collective attempts to access justice specifically concerning custody, land, and violence, this article identifies three persistent conditions that perpetuate women’s inability to access justice: the absence of gender mainstreaming resources in pluralist legal systems, most notably in rural, remote, and impoverished communities; cultural and religious preference for women’s underrepresentation in decision-making; and women’s low representation in justice-related civil service positions.
first_indexed 2024-03-14T00:06:03Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:282988
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-14T00:06:03Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Johns Hopkins University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:2829882023-11-17T03:39:35Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282988/ Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap? Mollica, Caitlin Davies, Sara E. True, Jacqui Eddyono, Sri Wiyanti Fonseka, Bhavani Johnston, Melissa International Law Across Asia and the Pacific, legal pluralist systems meet both cultural norms and address injustices at the local level. What is the capacity of these pluralist systems to provide justice and mitigate discrimination against women? This article examines women’s experiences across five countries to identify the factors that enable and constrain women’s engagement with legal pluralist justice systems in the Asia-Pacific region. Drawing on examples of women’s individual and collective attempts to access justice specifically concerning custody, land, and violence, this article identifies three persistent conditions that perpetuate women’s inability to access justice: the absence of gender mainstreaming resources in pluralist legal systems, most notably in rural, remote, and impoverished communities; cultural and religious preference for women’s underrepresentation in decision-making; and women’s low representation in justice-related civil service positions. Johns Hopkins University Press 2022 Article NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282988/1/WomenandJusticeDivide2022.pdf Mollica, Caitlin and Davies, Sara E. and True, Jacqui and Eddyono, Sri Wiyanti and Fonseka, Bhavani and Johnston, Melissa (2022) Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap? Human Rights Quarterly, 44 (3). 612 – 639. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135041177&partnerID=40&md5=278f5816aec603265b92d7f343c1107d
spellingShingle International Law
Mollica, Caitlin
Davies, Sara E.
True, Jacqui
Eddyono, Sri Wiyanti
Fonseka, Bhavani
Johnston, Melissa
Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap?
title Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap?
title_full Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap?
title_fullStr Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap?
title_full_unstemmed Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap?
title_short Women and the Justice Divide in Asia Pacific: How can Informal and Formal Institutions Bridge the Gap?
title_sort women and the justice divide in asia pacific how can informal and formal institutions bridge the gap
topic International Law
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282988/1/WomenandJusticeDivide2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mollicacaitlin womenandthejusticedivideinasiapacifichowcaninformalandformalinstitutionsbridgethegap
AT daviessarae womenandthejusticedivideinasiapacifichowcaninformalandformalinstitutionsbridgethegap
AT truejacqui womenandthejusticedivideinasiapacifichowcaninformalandformalinstitutionsbridgethegap
AT eddyonosriwiyanti womenandthejusticedivideinasiapacifichowcaninformalandformalinstitutionsbridgethegap
AT fonsekabhavani womenandthejusticedivideinasiapacifichowcaninformalandformalinstitutionsbridgethegap
AT johnstonmelissa womenandthejusticedivideinasiapacifichowcaninformalandformalinstitutionsbridgethegap