'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS.

This research analyzes Law No. 30 of 1999 of Indonesia to ascertain whether this Indonesian law constitutes modern arbitration legislation in the context of international commercial arbitration. Law No. 30 of 1999 will be compared with the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and the Internation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
Format: Article
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012
Subjects:
_version_ 1826033267712720896
author Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
author_facet Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
author_sort Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
collection UGM
description This research analyzes Law No. 30 of 1999 of Indonesia to ascertain whether this Indonesian law constitutes modern arbitration legislation in the context of international commercial arbitration. Law No. 30 of 1999 will be compared with the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and the International Arbitration Amendment Act 2010 (Cth) of Australia. In this research, the author finds the Model Law should be adopted by Indonesia to modernize the country s arbitration law in order for it to more acceptable in the practices of international commersial arbitration to day. Furthermore, the adaption of the Model Law also assists to clarity the Indonesian approach to the appircation of public policy principle which can be used to resest arbitral awards in Indonesia. Keywords: international commercial arbitration, Australia, Indonesia.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T19:07:34Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:28650
institution Universiti Gadjah Mada
last_indexed 2024-03-13T19:07:34Z
publishDate 2012
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:286502014-06-18T00:23:11Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/28650/ 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib Jurnal i-lib UGM This research analyzes Law No. 30 of 1999 of Indonesia to ascertain whether this Indonesian law constitutes modern arbitration legislation in the context of international commercial arbitration. Law No. 30 of 1999 will be compared with the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and the International Arbitration Amendment Act 2010 (Cth) of Australia. In this research, the author finds the Model Law should be adopted by Indonesia to modernize the country s arbitration law in order for it to more acceptable in the practices of international commersial arbitration to day. Furthermore, the adaption of the Model Law also assists to clarity the Indonesian approach to the appircation of public policy principle which can be used to resest arbitral awards in Indonesia. Keywords: international commercial arbitration, Australia, Indonesia. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012 Article NonPeerReviewed Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib (2012) 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. Jurnal i-lib UGM. http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=11713
spellingShingle Jurnal i-lib UGM
Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib
'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS.
title 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS.
title_full 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS.
title_fullStr 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS.
title_full_unstemmed 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS.
title_short 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS.
title_sort modern arbitration legislation a comparison between australian and indonesian laws
topic Jurnal i-lib UGM
work_keys_str_mv AT perpustakaanugmilib modernarbitrationlegislationacomparisonbetweenaustralianandindonesianlaws