'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS.
This research analyzes Law No. 30 of 1999 of Indonesia to ascertain whether this Indonesian law constitutes modern arbitration legislation in the context of international commercial arbitration. Law No. 30 of 1999 will be compared with the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and the Internation...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
Subjects: |
_version_ | 1826033267712720896 |
---|---|
author | Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib |
author_facet | Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib |
author_sort | Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib |
collection | UGM |
description | This research analyzes Law No. 30 of 1999 of Indonesia to ascertain whether this Indonesian law constitutes modern arbitration legislation in the context of international commercial arbitration. Law No. 30 of 1999 will be compared with the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and the International Arbitration Amendment Act 2010 (Cth) of Australia. In this research, the author finds the Model Law should be adopted by Indonesia to modernize the country s arbitration law in order for it to more acceptable in the practices of international commersial arbitration to day. Furthermore, the adaption of the
Model Law also assists to clarity the Indonesian approach to the appircation of public policy principle which can be used to resest arbitral awards in Indonesia. Keywords: international commercial arbitration, Australia, Indonesia. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T19:07:34Z |
format | Article |
id | oai:generic.eprints.org:28650 |
institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T19:07:34Z |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:286502014-06-18T00:23:11Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/28650/ 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib Jurnal i-lib UGM This research analyzes Law No. 30 of 1999 of Indonesia to ascertain whether this Indonesian law constitutes modern arbitration legislation in the context of international commercial arbitration. Law No. 30 of 1999 will be compared with the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) and the International Arbitration Amendment Act 2010 (Cth) of Australia. In this research, the author finds the Model Law should be adopted by Indonesia to modernize the country s arbitration law in order for it to more acceptable in the practices of international commersial arbitration to day. Furthermore, the adaption of the Model Law also assists to clarity the Indonesian approach to the appircation of public policy principle which can be used to resest arbitral awards in Indonesia. Keywords: international commercial arbitration, Australia, Indonesia. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012 Article NonPeerReviewed Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib (2012) 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. Jurnal i-lib UGM. http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=11713 |
spellingShingle | Jurnal i-lib UGM Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. |
title | 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. |
title_full | 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. |
title_fullStr | 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. |
title_full_unstemmed | 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. |
title_short | 'MODERN ARBITRATION LEGISLATION': A COMPARISON BETWEEN AUSTRALIAN AND INDONESIAN LAWS. |
title_sort | modern arbitration legislation a comparison between australian and indonesian laws |
topic | Jurnal i-lib UGM |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perpustakaanugmilib modernarbitrationlegislationacomparisonbetweenaustralianandindonesianlaws |