In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability
Abstract: The purpose of this study is to develop a new integrative theory of motivation drawn from the existing theories and data. The method used is a combination of meta-ethnography and grounded theory. The second phase of the study employed a thought experiment to test the newly developed theore...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797020020764573696 |
|---|---|
| author | Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib |
| author_facet | Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib |
| author_sort | Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib |
| collection | UGM |
| description | Abstract: The purpose of this study is to develop a new integrative theory of motivation drawn from the existing theories and data. The method used is a combination of meta-ethnography and grounded theory. The second phase of the study employed a thought experiment to test the newly developed theoretical propositions of motivational force. The first phase of the study revealed a central phenomenon for the occurrence of motivational force, i.e. "In Search for Anchors," which is a result of the paradox between freedom to choose and human vulnerability. "Freedom to choose" is the central factor of a motivational model that includes "urge," "challenge," "incentive," and "meaning." These five factors are motivational sources, which have holistic-dynamic-integrative interaction. Human vulnerability is the other side of the motivational model that comprises risk, uncertainty, and hope that ignite motivational force. The dynamic interaction of risk, uncertainty, and hope is represented in a mathematical formula that produces the strength of the force, (R - H)2 x U, which can be potrayed in a "twin-pea,k" curve. The thought experiment was conducted to test the hypothetical formula. The result shows that the "twinpeak" hypothesis is supported but the shape of the curve is found to be not symmetrical. The data show that hope is the strongest motivational force, therefore the formula is modified into =(R - U)2 x H. The implication of the study and the utility of the new theory .are discussed. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-05T23:13:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | oai:generic.eprints.org:28969 |
| institution | Universiti Gadjah Mada |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T19:09:09Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publisher | [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oai:generic.eprints.org:289692014-06-18T00:23:08Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/28969/ In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib Jurnal i-lib UGM Abstract: The purpose of this study is to develop a new integrative theory of motivation drawn from the existing theories and data. The method used is a combination of meta-ethnography and grounded theory. The second phase of the study employed a thought experiment to test the newly developed theoretical propositions of motivational force. The first phase of the study revealed a central phenomenon for the occurrence of motivational force, i.e. "In Search for Anchors," which is a result of the paradox between freedom to choose and human vulnerability. "Freedom to choose" is the central factor of a motivational model that includes "urge," "challenge," "incentive," and "meaning." These five factors are motivational sources, which have holistic-dynamic-integrative interaction. Human vulnerability is the other side of the motivational model that comprises risk, uncertainty, and hope that ignite motivational force. The dynamic interaction of risk, uncertainty, and hope is represented in a mathematical formula that produces the strength of the force, (R - H)2 x U, which can be potrayed in a "twin-pea,k" curve. The thought experiment was conducted to test the hypothetical formula. The result shows that the "twinpeak" hypothesis is supported but the shape of the curve is found to be not symmetrical. The data show that hope is the strongest motivational force, therefore the formula is modified into =(R - U)2 x H. The implication of the study and the utility of the new theory .are discussed. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012 Article NonPeerReviewed Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib (2012) In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability. Jurnal i-lib UGM. http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=12032 |
| spellingShingle | Jurnal i-lib UGM Perpustakaan UGM, i-lib In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability |
| title | In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability |
| title_full | In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability |
| title_fullStr | In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability |
| title_full_unstemmed | In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability |
| title_short | In Searchfor Anchors The Fundamental Motivational Forcein Compensating for Human Vulnerability |
| title_sort | in searchfor anchors the fundamental motivational forcein compensating for human vulnerability |
| topic | Jurnal i-lib UGM |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT perpustakaanugmilib insearchforanchorsthefundamentalmotivationalforceincompensatingforhumanvulnerability |