Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination

European travel writing (1512–1984) represented Malaysia as a tropical Garden of Eden, an image that has also percolated into literary texts concerning the region. This article examines spatial images in British fiction through the framework of archetypal literary criticism and theories of colonial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmad, Siti Nuraishah
Format: Article
Language:English
English
English
English
Published: Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/2/Siti_Nuraishah_Cerification.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/4/siti_nuraishah_final.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/7/IREP_NO.29773.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/9/29773_Malaysia%20as%20the%20Archetypal%20Garden%20in%20the%20British%20Creative%20Imagination_SCOPUS.pdf
_version_ 1796877972175585280
author Ahmad, Siti Nuraishah
author_facet Ahmad, Siti Nuraishah
author_sort Ahmad, Siti Nuraishah
collection IIUM
description European travel writing (1512–1984) represented Malaysia as a tropical Garden of Eden, an image that has also percolated into literary texts concerning the region. This article examines spatial images in British fiction through the framework of archetypal literary criticism and theories of colonial representations of space to reveal the worlding (Spivak 1999) of Malaysia as a garden. In order to ascertain the ways in which the garden archetype has been deployed by the British creative imagination in the past and the present, novels from the colonial and postcolonial periods have been selected for analysis. Three dominant incarnations of the garden archetype can be discerned throughout novels by Joseph Conrad, W. Somerset Maugham, and Anthony Burgess: the lush, Romantic garden; the restrained, disciplined Victorian garden; and the barren, dried-up garden. The postcolonial British novel, for its part, deploys images of the barren garden revived (William Riviere’s Borneo Fire) as well as a return to the earlier Conradian image of the Romantic locus amoenus (Frederick Lees’ Fool’s Gold). This article concludes that the representation of Malaysia in various guises of the archetypal garden negates the indigenous worldview concerning space and produces instead “knowledge” about Malaysia rooted in the white man’s perspective
first_indexed 2024-03-05T23:14:55Z
format Article
id oai:generic.eprints.org:29773
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
language English
English
English
English
last_indexed 2024-03-05T23:14:55Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University
record_format dspace
spelling oai:generic.eprints.org:297732017-09-20T02:31:19Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/ Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination Ahmad, Siti Nuraishah PR English literature European travel writing (1512–1984) represented Malaysia as a tropical Garden of Eden, an image that has also percolated into literary texts concerning the region. This article examines spatial images in British fiction through the framework of archetypal literary criticism and theories of colonial representations of space to reveal the worlding (Spivak 1999) of Malaysia as a garden. In order to ascertain the ways in which the garden archetype has been deployed by the British creative imagination in the past and the present, novels from the colonial and postcolonial periods have been selected for analysis. Three dominant incarnations of the garden archetype can be discerned throughout novels by Joseph Conrad, W. Somerset Maugham, and Anthony Burgess: the lush, Romantic garden; the restrained, disciplined Victorian garden; and the barren, dried-up garden. The postcolonial British novel, for its part, deploys images of the barren garden revived (William Riviere’s Borneo Fire) as well as a return to the earlier Conradian image of the Romantic locus amoenus (Frederick Lees’ Fool’s Gold). This article concludes that the representation of Malaysia in various guises of the archetypal garden negates the indigenous worldview concerning space and produces instead “knowledge” about Malaysia rooted in the white man’s perspective Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/2/Siti_Nuraishah_Cerification.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/4/siti_nuraishah_final.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/7/IREP_NO.29773.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/9/29773_Malaysia%20as%20the%20Archetypal%20Garden%20in%20the%20British%20Creative%20Imagination_SCOPUS.pdf Ahmad, Siti Nuraishah (2014) Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination. Southeast Asian Studies. ISSN 0563-8682 (In Press) http://englishkyoto-seas.org/
spellingShingle PR English literature
Ahmad, Siti Nuraishah
Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination
title Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination
title_full Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination
title_fullStr Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination
title_full_unstemmed Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination
title_short Malaysia as the Archetypal Garden in the British Creative Imagination
title_sort malaysia as the archetypal garden in the british creative imagination
topic PR English literature
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/2/Siti_Nuraishah_Cerification.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/4/siti_nuraishah_final.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/7/IREP_NO.29773.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/29773/9/29773_Malaysia%20as%20the%20Archetypal%20Garden%20in%20the%20British%20Creative%20Imagination_SCOPUS.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadsitinuraishah malaysiaasthearchetypalgardeninthebritishcreativeimagination